Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

BrainScope Ahead 100

BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC • Neurology • 11/17/2014

De NovoIEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The BrainScope Ahead 100 is a portable EEG-based device that analyzes quantitative metrics from frontal brain activity to classify adult patients with recent, mild closed head injuries for the likelihood of structural brain injury. Its purpose is to supplement clinical judgment and reduce unnecessary CT scans by offering a highly sensitive, moderately specific screening tool.

Summary

The BrainScope Ahead 100 is a portable medical device designed for the assessment of adult patients, aged 18 to 80, who have sustained a closed head injury within the preceding 24 hours and present with a mild Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 13 to 15. Its core methodology involves recording electroencephalography (EEG) data specifically from the frontal region of the brain. This data is then processed to calculate a range of quantitative metrics, including but not limited to power spectrum, coherence between different brain regions, asymmetry in brain activity, and fractal dimension. Based on these complex electrophysiological measurements, the device's algorithm classifies patients as either 'Negative' or 'Positive' for the likelihood of a structural brain injury, thereby aiding clinicians in the critical decision of whether a computed tomography (CT) scan is warranted. The development of the BrainScope Ahead 100's diagnostic algorithm was informed by data collected from trauma patients who had undergone CT scans, allowing for correlation between EEG findings and confirmed structural injuries. This development process yielded a device with reported performance characteristics of approximately 95% sensitivity in detecting structural brain injuries and around 68% specificity in correctly identifying patients without such injuries. It is intended to function as an adjunct to standard clinical evaluation, not a replacement. The primary aim of the BrainScope Ahead 100 is to reduce the frequency of unnecessary head CT scans and their associated costs and radiation exposure, while concurrently ensuring that patients who do have structural brain injuries and require further imaging are promptly and accurately identified for appropriate medical management.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

BrainScope Ahead 100Electroencephalography (EEG)Closed head injuryGlasgow Coma Scale (GCS)Quantitative EEG metricsStructural brain injuryCT scanSensitivitySpecificityClinical assessment

Device Metadata

Submission Number
DEN140025
Company
BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC
Panel
Neurology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Signals
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
diagnosis

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the BrainScope Ahead 100's performance (sensitivity and specificity) vary across the spectrum of GCS scores (13, 14, and 15) within its indicated patient population?; What specific quantitative EEG features (e.g., particular frequency bands for power, specific electrode pair coherences) are most heavily weighted in the device's algorithm for classifying structural brain injury?; Are there studies evaluating the impact of confounding factors, such as recent alcohol or drug use, or pre-existing neurological conditions, on the accuracy of the BrainScope Ahead 100's classifications?; What is the learning curve for clinicians to effectively integrate the BrainScope Ahead 100 into their workflow, and what is the average time saved per patient encounter where a CT scan is avoided?; Beyond the binary Negative/Positive classification, does the device provide any graded output or confidence score that could offer more nuanced guidance to clinicians, especially in borderline cases?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via De Novo pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score5/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(algorithm)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
BrainScope Ahead 100 - BRAINSCOPE COMPANY, INC | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence