Quantib Brain 1
QUANTIB BV • Radiology • 06/17/2016
Device Purpose
Quantib Brain 1 is a medical imaging software designed to provide automated volumetric quantification of brain structures from MR images, including grey matter, white matter, CSF, and white matter hyperintensities, to support clinical assessment. The system utilizes an atlas-based segmentation methodology, integrating histogram analysis and trained classifiers for enhanced white matter hyperintensity detection, and functions as a post-processing plugin for GE Advantage Workstation platforms.
Summary
Quantib Brain 1 is a post-processing medical imaging software designed for GE Advantage (AW 4.7) and AW Server (AWS 3.2) platforms. Its primary purpose is to automate the labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of identifiable brain structures from Magnetic Resonance (MR) images, specifically utilizing 3D T1-weighted MR scans, with an additional T2-weighted FLAIR MR image for white matter hyperintensities (WMH) segmentation. The software's methodology aims to provide clinicians with both absolute and relative volume measurements of these structures, aiding in the evaluation, assessment, and quantitative reporting of MR brain images; a key aspect of its workflow includes mandatory user review and potential editing of automatically detected WMH candidates prior to their validation and subsequent volumetric analysis. The core science of Quantib Brain 1 is founded on an atlas-based segmentation system, which employs a library of atlases, each comprising a 3D T1-weighted MR image and a corresponding label map for dividing the image into different tissue segments; this is further refined for WMH segmentation through the integration of histogram analysis and trained classifiers to improve accuracy. Performance data, derived from comparisons with manual segmentations, showed that for brain tissue volumetry (Grey Matter, White Matter, CSF, Intracranial Volume) on 33 T1w MR images, Dice similarity coefficients ranged from 0.78 for CSF to 0.97 for ICV, with absolute differences in relative volumes between 1.6 and 2.8 percentage points. For the WMH protocol tested on 30 image sets, the software achieved an average Dice overlap of 0.61 ± 0.13 and an absolute difference in relative WMH volumes of 0.6 ± 0.7 percentage points when compared to manual segmentations.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the performance of Quantib Brain's atlas-based segmentation for WMH (Dice 0.61 ± 0.13) compare to state-of-the-art deep learning models in terms of both accuracy and computational efficiency on typical clinical MR scans?; What is the typical time required for user review and editing of WMH candidates, and how does this impact overall workflow efficiency in a busy clinical radiology setting?; How does the variability in MR acquisition parameters (e.g., scanner vendor, field strength, sequence parameters beyond the specified 3D T1w or T2w FLAIR) affect the robustness and accuracy of Quantib Brain's segmentation results?; Are there specific patient populations or types of brain pathology (beyond WMH) where Quantib Brain's current atlas-based approach might be less accurate, and what are the plans to address such limitations?; Given the quantitative outputs (e.g., absolute/relative volumes), what is the evidence or plan for validating their clinical utility in diagnosing specific neurological conditions or monitoring disease progression beyond general 'assessment'?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly