Tissue of Origin Test Kit-FFPE
Cancer Genetics, Inc. • Clinical Tcxicology • 03/15/2018
Device Purpose
The Cancer Genetics Tissue of Origin Test Kit-FFPE is an in vitro diagnostic that compares RNA expression patterns from a patient's FFPE tumor to a database of fifteen tumor types using microarray technology and a similarity score algorithm. Its purpose is to assist physicians by providing additional information on tumor characteristics, with stated limitations regarding definitive diagnosis of origin, subclassification, or prognostic predictions.
Summary
The Cancer Genetics Tissue of Origin Test Kit-FFPE is an in vitro diagnostic tool designed to measure the similarity between RNA expression patterns in a patient's formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor and RNA expression patterns from a database of fifteen specific tumor types. These database tumor types include poorly differentiated, undifferentiated, and metastatic cases diagnosed by standard clinical and pathological practices. The methodology involves using a reagent kit, a microchip (Pathchip® with 2000 gene expression probes), and software to compare these expression patterns. The test requires external equipment, including an Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station, GeneChip Scanner, and a workstation with GeneChip Operating System. It is intended to be used by a qualified physician in conjunction with other clinical and diagnostic information. This document details modifications to the test, specifically a change in the RNA amplification method and reagents from the RampUp RNA amplification Kit to the GeneChip™ 3' IVT Pico Kit, and an update to the microarray processing software from Genechip™ System 3000 Dx to Genechip™ System 3000 Dx v.2. Non-clinical validation studies showed a 90.8% concordance (133 out of 142 specimens) for the reagent change and 100% concordance (20 out of 20 specimens) for the software update when results were compared to the previous methods. The test has limitations: it is not intended to establish the origin of tumors that cannot be diagnosed by current practices (e.g., cancer of unknown primary), nor to subclassify tumors, predict disease course, survival, treatment efficacy, or distinguish primary from metastatic tumors. Furthermore, results cannot distinguish tumor types in the database from those not in the database if they exhibit similar RNA expression patterns.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. What are the specific 2000 gene expression probes employed by the Pathchip® microarray, and how were they selected for differentiating the 15 tumor types?; How does the 'similarity score algorithm' quantitatively determine the degree of similarity between a patient's tumor RNA expression and the database profiles?; What were the characteristics of the 9 discordant cases in the reagent comparison study (133/142 concordance), and could these discrepancies highlight specific sensitivities or limitations of the new GeneChip™ 3' IVT Pico Kit?; Given the limitation that tumor types not in the database may show similar RNA patterns, what is the potential rate of misinterpretation or inconclusive results when applied to a diverse clinical population beyond the validation set?; What were the pre-established acceptance criteria for the reagent modification study that deemed the 90.8% concordance (133/142) as successful validation?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, HBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly