KardiaAI
AliveCor, Inc. • Cardiovascular • 03/11/2019
Device Purpose
KardiaAI is a software analysis library designed for integration into ambulatory ECG devices, utilizing an API to provide algorithmic analysis of adult ECG rhythms. Its science involves ECG signal processing for noise filtering, heart rate calculation, and the automated detection of normal sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and tachycardia, validated through non-clinical performance testing.
Summary
KardiaAI is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) developed by AliveCor, Inc., functioning as a software analysis library. It is designed to be integrated into other ambulatory ECG device software via an Application Program Interface (API) to process and analyze 30-second electrocardiogram (ECG) rhythms from adult subjects. The core purpose of KardiaAI is to compute various physiologic parameters from ECGs, providing capabilities such as ECG noise filtering, heart rate measurement, detection of noisy ECGs, and ECG rhythm analysis. It is specifically intended for use with compatible event recorders or similar ambulatory ECG devices and is not designed for life-supporting systems, ECG monitors, cardiac alarms, or over-the-counter (OTC) use only devices. The KardiaAI library's analytical capabilities extend to detecting the presence of normal sinus rhythm, atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and tachycardia, with these rhythm analyses intended for use when prescribed or under the care of a physician. The algorithms for atrial fibrillation, normal sinus rhythm, and noise detection are shared with a predicate device, the Kardia Band System, while KardiaAI introduces additional classifiers for bradycardia and tachycardia. Non-clinical performance testing, utilizing ECG databases from the ANSI/AAMI EC57:2012 standard and proprietary AliveCor databases, was conducted to verify that the device performs as intended. This testing demonstrated that KardiaAI meets its specifications and its performance, including the newer algorithms and multi-lead ambulatory ECG input capability, is substantially equivalent to predicate devices.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. What are the specific performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity, accuracy) of the KardiaAI algorithms for detecting atrial fibrillation, bradycardia, and tachycardia across diverse adult patient populations with varying comorbidities?; How does the KardiaAI's noise filtering algorithm differentiate between true physiological artifact and subtle pathological ECG changes, and what is its impact on diagnostic accuracy?; What are the technical integration requirements and potential compatibility challenges when incorporating the KardiaAI API library into different third-party ambulatory ECG hardware and software platforms?; How does the KardiaAI handle ECG recordings of durations significantly different from the 30-second standard, and what is the performance degradation, if any, for shorter or longer recordings?; What validation was performed to ensure the KardiaAI's algorithms are robust and maintain performance across different ECG signal qualities, lead configurations (beyond Lead I if applicable for multi-lead input), and patient-specific morphologies encountered from various compatible ambulatory ECG devices?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of SBOM, ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly