Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis Software
Persyst Development Corporation • Neurology • 11/29/2018
Device Purpose
Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis Software is designed to assist clinicians by processing EEG recordings to automatically identify potential seizure and spike events, quantify EEG characteristics, and reduce common artifacts. Its methodology relies on analyzing scalp EEG data to provide supplementary information for neurological assessment, always requiring expert interpretation of the original waveforms and not offering standalone diagnostic conclusions.
Summary
Persyst 14 EEG Review and Analysis Software is a tool intended for qualified medical practitioners to aid in the review, monitoring, and analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) recordings. The software processes EEG data acquired through scalp electrodes using the standard 10/20 system. Its primary functionalities include marking previously acquired EEG sections that may correspond to electrographic seizures in adults (18 years and older) and spikes in patients from one month of age. Furthermore, it calculates and displays various quantitative EEG measures such as FFT, Rhythmicity, Peak Envelope, Artifact Intensity, Amplitude, Relative Symmetry, and Suppression Ratio, all of which require interpretation in conjunction with the original EEG waveforms. The software also incorporates Persyst AR for reducing EMG, eye movement, and electrode artifacts, though it may modify cerebral activity waveforms and doesn't eliminate all artifacts. It features an aEEG (amplitude-integrated EEG) display for monitoring brain state and can show physiological signals, including heart rate derived from the EEG's ECG channel (not for patients with pacemakers). Persyst 14 provides notifications for seizure detection, quantitative EEG, and aEEG during acquisition processing, with potential delays; these are not substitutes for real-time expert monitoring. The device explicitly does not offer diagnostic conclusions, emphasizing that all interpretations must be made by qualified clinicians referencing the original EEG data.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. What is the validated sensitivity and specificity of the Seizure Detection component in diverse adult populations, particularly for non-convulsive seizures or those with subtle electrographic manifestations?; How does the Persyst AR artifact reduction algorithm differentiate between complex artifacts (e.g., EMG, eye movement) and genuine cerebral activity, especially in low amplitude or noisy EEG recordings, and what is its impact on subsequent quantitative analysis?; What is the comparative performance of the Spike Detection component across different pediatric age groups (especially near the one-month limit) and for various interictal epileptiform discharge morphologies?; What is the typical latency and reliability of the notification system (on-screen and email) for seizure detection and critical qEEG changes in a real-world, networked clinical environment, and how might this affect timely clinical response?; Are there specific EEG patterns or patient conditions where the quantitative EEG measures (e.g., Rhythmicity, Suppression Ratio) provided by Persyst 14 have demonstrated superior clinical utility in aiding assessment compared to traditional visual review alone?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly