AVIEW LCS
Coreline Soft Co., Ltd • Radiology • 05/05/2020
Device Purpose
AVIEW LCS is an image processing software designed to aid in the characterization of lung nodules from thoracic CT images using semi-automatic segmentation, comprehensive measurements, and CAD integration. It leverages deep-learning for anatomical segmentation, applies the PANCAN risk model for malignancy assessment, and uses Lung-RADS for standardized reporting and tracking nodule evolution with VDT.
Summary
AVIEW LCS is an advanced image processing software designed for the detailed review, analysis, and reporting of thoracic CT images, specifically focusing on the characterization of lung nodules. Its core purpose is to assist clinicians by providing comprehensive tools for nodule assessment, whether in a single study or across multiple studies over time for follow-up. The system facilitates semi-automatic nodule segmentation and offers a suite of measurements including nodule type, precise location, size (major/minor axes, effective diameter from volume), overall volume, Hounsfield Unit (HU) statistics (mean, min, max), mass, and specific volumetric details of solid nodule components. It also supports workflow integration by allowing the import of results from compatible Computer-Aided Detection (CAD) systems for automated nodule detection. The scientific methodology underpinning AVIEW LCS incorporates several advanced features. It utilizes deep-learning algorithms for improved segmentation of lungs and lobes, enhancing the accuracy of nodule localization and analysis. For risk stratification, the software calculates a malignancy score based on the PANCAN risk model. AVIEW LCS automates the categorization of findings using the Lung-RADS classification system, promoting standardized reporting and management recommendations. Furthermore, it supports longitudinal tracking through automated nodule matching between scans and calculates Volume Doubling Time (VDT) to assess nodule growth. The system generates comprehensive reports, including PDF and DICOM structured reports, encapsulating all findings and classifications.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. What are the specific performance metrics (e.g., Dice similarity coefficient) for the deep-learning based lung and lobe segmentation algorithms, especially in challenging cases with adhesions or severe pathology?; How does the AVIEW LCS system handle variations in CT acquisition parameters (e.g., slice thickness, reconstruction kernel) when performing nodule measurements and calculating VDT across follow-up scans?; What validation studies were performed to assess the accuracy and reliability of the PANCAN risk model implementation within AVIEW LCS across diverse patient cohorts and nodule characteristics?; How does the semi-automatic nodule segmentation tool perform with various nodule morphologies (e.g., spiculated, lobulated, ground-glass, part-solid), and what is the typical user interaction time required for accurate segmentation?; Regarding the Mevis CAD integration, how are discrepancies between CAD-detected nodules and user-identified nodules managed within the AVIEW LCS workflow, and how does the system ensure all relevant findings are incorporated into the final report?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly