AVIEW
Coreline Soft Co., Ltd • Radiology • 08/26/2020
Device Purpose
AVIEW is an advanced image processing software that leverages deep-learning algorithms to provide quantitative analysis of CT thoracic and cardiac datasets, aiding physicians in diagnosing and managing pulmonary diseases and assessing cardiovascular risk. Its methodology encompasses automated segmentation of anatomical structures, detailed characterization of lung nodules including Lung-RADS classification, and coronary artery calcification analysis with Agatston scoring.
Summary
AVIEW is an image processing software designed for the review and analysis of CT thoracic and cardiac datasets. Its purpose is to support physicians quantitatively in diagnosis, follow-up evaluation, and documentation by providing image segmentation of sub-structures in the lung (lobes, airways) and heart, registration of inspiration/expiration CT scans for analyzing air trapping volume and inspiration/expiration ratio, and tools for volumetric/structural analysis, density evaluation, and reporting. The software, installable on a PC and accessible on-premise or via cloud (including mobile devices), utilizes DICOM 3.0 and employs deep-learning algorithms for automatic lung/lobe/airway segmentation and inspiration/expiration registration. The software offers comprehensive characterization of lung nodules, including type, location, size, volume, Hounsfield Unit (HU) values, mass, volumetric measures, Volume Doubling Time (VDT), and Lung-RADS classification, integrating with third-party CAD for nodule detection. For cardiac assessment, AVIEW performs Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) analysis by segmenting four main arteries, extracting calcium, providing Agatston, volume, and mass scores, and assessing CAC risk based on age and gender, utilizing deep learning for calcium segmentation. Additional features include COPD analysis, LAA analysis with 3D cluster sizing, airway wall thickness measurement, a 'Lobar-pealing method' for pulmonary vessel analysis, and export of over 1000 feature values for radiomics research. Its performance and functionality were established through non-clinical software verification and validation testing.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. What is the documented accuracy and processing speed of the deep-learning algorithms for lung, lobe, and airway segmentation compared to manual segmentation or other AI tools?; How does AVIEW's 'Lobar-pealing method' for pulmonary vessel analysis technically operate, and what are its specific advantages in clinical scenarios over conventional vessel analysis techniques?; What validation studies support the accuracy of the Coronary Artery Calcification (CAC) risk assessment based on age and gender, particularly across diverse patient populations?; Can the software differentiate and quantify various components of complex lung nodules (e.g., solid vs. ground-glass opacity proportions), and how does this influence Lung-RADS categorization and Volume Doubling Time (VDT) calculation?; What are the specific '1000+ feature values' exported for radiomics research, and how are the segmentation masks stored in open formats (Analyze or NifTi) structured for such research purposes?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly