Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

X100 with Full Field Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) Application

Scopio Labs LTD. • Hematology • 10/02/2020

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The X100 with Full Field Peripheral Blood Smear Application is an automated digital microscopy system designed to enhance the efficiency and standardization of peripheral blood smear analysis by locating, imaging, and pre-classifying blood cells for technologist review. It leverages oil-free high-resolution imaging technology combined with artificial neural networks to assist in performing WBC differentials, RBC morphology evaluations, and platelet estimations, demonstrating substantial equivalence to traditional manual methods in performance studies.

Summary

The Scopio Labs X100 with Full Field Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) Application is an in vitro diagnostic device designed to assist qualified technologists in hematological analysis. It automates the process of locating and displaying high-resolution digital images of white blood cells (WBCs), red blood cells (RBCs), and platelets from fixed and Romanowsky-stained peripheral blood smears. The system employs a unique image acquisition technique, capturing multiple images under various illumination conditions to reconstruct a 100X equivalent magnification image without immersion oil. For WBC differentials, it utilizes artificial neural networks (ANNs) for automated detection and pre-classification into 18 distinct categories, which the user then reviews and can modify; RBC morphology is characterized by the user based on presented images, and platelet estimation is initially automated with subsequent user review and adjustment capabilities. Performance evaluation of the X100 system, through a method comparison study involving 645 specimens against manual light microscopy, demonstrated strong concordance for key hematological parameters. For WBC differentials, the device showed high correlation coefficients (e.g., 98% for neutrophils, 96% for lymphocytes) and an overall efficiency of 96.29%, with a sensitivity of 87.86% and specificity of 97.62%. RBC morphology evaluation yielded a very high overall agreement of 99.77% with the manual method, and platelet estimation achieved a correlation coefficient of 94%, an efficiency of 94.89%, sensitivity of 90.00%, and specificity of 96.28%. Comprehensive precision studies, adhering to CLSI EP05-A3 guidelines for repeatability and reproducibility across multiple sites, further validated the device's consistent and reliable performance.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Peripheral Blood SmearDigital ImagingAutomated Cell LocationWBC DifferentialRBC MorphologyPlatelet EstimationArtificial Neural NetworksHematology AnalyzerIn Vitro DiagnosticRomanowsky Stain

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K201301
Company
Scopio Labs LTD.
Panel
Hematology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
detection

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the oil-free 100X reconstructed image quality of the X100 system compare to traditional oil immersion microscopy in terms of resolving subtle cellular details critical for diagnosing rare or complex hematological conditions?; What is the observed impact of the expanded 18-category WBC pre-classification system on workflow efficiency, diagnostic accuracy, and learning curve for technologists with varying levels of experience?; Does the X100 system's Artificial Neural Network architecture allow for site-specific calibration or user-feedback-based retraining to improve its classification accuracy for particularly challenging or locally prevalent abnormal cell morphologies?; What is the quantitative difference in average turnaround time for a complete peripheral blood smear analysis (WBC differential, RBC morphology, and platelet estimate) using the X100 system compared to fully manual methods in a typical high-volume clinical laboratory setting?; Are there specific RBC morphological abnormalities or platelet clumping/abnormality scenarios where the X100's automated detection and estimation show limitations compared to expert manual review, and how are these instances flagged or managed within the system's workflow?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(neural network, retraining)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(network, cellular)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
X100 with Full Field Peripheral Blood Smear (PBS) Application - Scopio Labs LTD. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence