Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

EchoGo Pro

Ultromics Ltd • Radiology • 12/18/2020

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

EchoGo Pro is a machine learning-based software designed to assist physicians in assessing coronary artery disease by automatically analyzing stress echocardiogram images. It utilizes DICOM datasets to perform left ventricular segmentation and calculate geometric parameters, which are then processed by a pre-trained classification model to provide a categorical assessment of significant CAD likelihood.

Summary

EchoGo Pro v1.0.2 is a standalone software application designed as an adjunct to diagnostic stress echocardiography for assessing coronary artery disease (CAD). It processes anonymized DICOM 3.0 compliant stress echo (SE) datasets, utilizing standard clinical protocols with apical 2-chamber, 4-chamber, and parasternal short-axis views at rest and peak stress. The software automatically registers images, segments the left ventricle (LV) by detecting endocardial contours, and allows trained operators to review and approve these contours. Approved contours are then used to calculate geometric parameters, which are fed into a fixed, pre-trained machine learning classification model to assess the possibility of significant CAD, defined as ≥70% stenosis in major coronary arteries. Performance testing demonstrated that EchoGo Pro improved diagnostic accuracy and inter-operator agreement. When readers used EchoGo Pro, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) showed a mean improvement of 0.054 (95% CI 0.032, 0.077, p=0.02) compared to unaided interpretation, exceeding the mean reader improvement reported for the predicate device (0.034). The native system performance of EchoGo Pro achieved an AUROC of 0.927, with a specificity of 0.927 (95% CI 0.878, 0.976) and a sensitivity of 0.844 (95% CI 0.739, 0.950), which was greater than the native system performance reported for the predicate device (0.882). Furthermore, inter-clinician agreement, measured by the Kendall Tau-B correlation coefficient, significantly increased from an average of 0.58 (unaided) to 0.82 (aided by EchoGo Pro) (p<0.001), also exceeding the improvement reported for the predicate device (0.1393).

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

EchoGo ProCoronary Artery Disease (CAD)Stress EchocardiographyMachine LearningDICOMLeft Ventricle (LV) SegmentationRegion of Interest (ROI)AUROCDiagnostic AidInter-operator Agreement

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K201555
Company
Ultromics Ltd
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
diagnosis

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. What specific geometric parameters calculated from the LV contours are most heavily weighted by the classification model in determining CAD likelihood?; How was the 'known outcome' dataset for training the classification model curated, and what measures were taken to ensure its diversity and representativeness of the intended use population, especially considering the 6-month window for invasive angiography?; What is the impact of suboptimal image quality or variability in input DICOM stress echo datasets (e.g., from different ultrasound machines or sonographer skill levels) on the performance of the auto-contouring algorithm and the final CAD assessment?; Beyond the reported AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity, what are the positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of EchoGo Pro in target populations with varying prevalences of significant CAD?; Given its limitation for patients with previous CABG surgery, what other patient subgroups or comorbidities were excluded from validation, and are there plans to validate its use in these populations?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score25/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment✓ Detected in Summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(machine learning, algorithm, dataset)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
EchoGo Pro - Ultromics Ltd | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence