Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Oncospace

Oncospace, Inc. • Radiology • 03/12/2021

510(k)IEC 62304 Class C
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

Oncospace is a software tool designed to enhance radiotherapy treatment planning by providing patient-specific dosimetric objectives for organs at risk, aiming to improve plan quality and operational efficiency. It utilizes machine learning for prostate cases and statistical database comparisons of anatomical geometry for other sites to predict achievable dose levels, thereby assisting clinicians in optimizing treatment plans within their existing Treatment Planning Systems without supplanting their ultimate clinical judgment.

Summary

Oncospace is a software system designed to assist radiation oncologists and medical dosimetrists in planning radiotherapy treatments for patients with conditions in the prostate, thoracic, pancreas, or head & neck regions. It functions as an adjunct to existing Treatment Planning Systems (TPS), employing machine learning algorithms for prostate cases and statistical or database lookup methods for the other specified anatomical sites. The core methodology involves predicting patient-specific dosimetric goals for Organs at Risk (OARs) by comparing an individual patient's anatomical geometry to a database of previously approved treatment plans. This enables users to select and customize treatment planning protocols, including dose prescriptions, delivery methods, and OAR objectives, and facilitates the automated initiation of plan optimization on a TPS by supplying these individualized parameters. The primary value of Oncospace lies in its capability to individualize OAR dose goals, moving beyond population-based protocol criteria to potentially identify opportunities for enhanced OAR dose reduction or to prevent overly aggressive sparing that might compromise target coverage or other OARs. This approach is intended to shorten the iterative process of treatment plan adjustment. The software provides a user interface for evaluating plans against both protocol-based and its predicted goals, although final clinical judgment in accepting these goals and assessing overall plan quality remains with the healthcare professional. Oncospace does not directly interface with treatment delivery machines. Performance validation, conducted using retrospective clinical data, demonstrated that the system reduced the average number of iterations required to achieve a clinically viable and deliverable radiation treatment plan by nearly two-thirds.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Radiotherapy PlanningTreatment Planning System (TPS) AugmentationMachine LearningDosimetric GoalsOrgans at Risk (OAR)Patient-Specific GeometryPlan OptimizationPhoton RadiotherapyTreatment Plan Iteration ReductionClinical Workflow Efficiency

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K202284
Company
Oncospace, Inc.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Intervention
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the performance of the static machine learning models for prostate plan predictions compare to the statistical/database lookup methods used for thoracic, pancreas, and head & neck cases in terms of predictive accuracy and clinical utility?; What is the size, diversity, and quality control process for the database of approved treatment plans that Oncospace uses to ensure robust and generalizable OAR dose goal predictions across different patient populations?; Could the system's methodology for predicting OAR dose goals be adapted or extended in future versions to incorporate functional imaging data or other patient-specific biological markers beyond anatomical geometry?; What is the typical learning curve for radiation therapy professionals to effectively integrate Oncospace into their existing workflow, and how does it impact overall treatment planning time beyond just the reduction in optimization iterations?; Are there specific complex anatomical scenarios or patient subgroups where Oncospace demonstrates a markedly more significant advantage in OAR sparing or achieving optimal target coverage compared to traditional planning methods?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(machine learning, algorithm)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials(operational)
✓ Detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Oncospace - Oncospace, Inc. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence