BrainInsight
Hyperfine Research, Inc • Radiology • 01/07/2021
Device Purpose
BrainInsight is an automated software that utilizes machine learning to analyze low-field MR images, providing quantitative measurements of brain structures. Its methodology involves segmenting brain anatomy, including ventricles and calculating midline shift, to generate reports and annotated images for clinical support.
Summary
BrainInsight is an automated medical software designed for post-processing low-field (64mT) Magnetic Resonance (MR) images of the brain in patients aged 18 or older. Its core purpose is to provide automatic labeling, spatial measurement, and volumetric quantification of various brain structures. The software processes 3D MRI series, specifically T1 and T2-weighted sequences, to generate annotated and segmented images, color overlays highlighting distinct regions, and comprehensive reports. These outputs, in standard DICOM format, are intended to support clinicians in the assessment of structural MRIs by offering detailed anatomical information. The system utilizes a proprietary automated internal pipeline driven by machine learning tools to perform complex tasks such as whole brain segmentation, ventricle segmentation, and midline shift measurements. It also incorporates automated quality control features, including tissue contrast checks and scan protocol verification, to ensure data integrity. BrainInsight operates on a standard computing platform, potentially cloud-based in a serverless environment, and integrates with Picture Archive and Communications Systems (PACS) for input of MR images and output of results. The typical processing time for a set of images is approximately 7 minutes. Non-clinical performance evaluations confirmed software functionalities including segmentation, measurement capabilities, and data quality control.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the performance of BrainInsight's machine learning algorithms for brain segmentation compare to established radiological gold standards or manual segmentation by neuroradiologists, particularly in the context of low-field MRI data?; What specific machine learning models or architectural components are utilized in the proprietary automated internal pipeline, and how were they trained and validated for robustness across diverse patient populations and imaging artifacts common in low-field MRI?; Given its operation on 64mT low-field MRIs, what is the sensitivity and specificity of BrainInsight in detecting subtle structural abnormalities or changes compared to software designed for high-field MRI data?; How do the automated quality control functions, such as 'tissue contrast check' and 'scan protocol verification', operate, and what are the acceptance criteria for image input to ensure optimal performance of the segmentation and measurement algorithms?; Are there any known limitations of BrainInsight related to specific neuropathologies, patient demographics (beyond age 18+), or MR acquisition parameters that might affect the accuracy of its automated labeling, spatial measurements, or volumetric quantifications?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly