Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

BU-CAD

TaiHao Medical Inc. • Radiology • 12/21/2021

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

BU-CAD is an AI-powered software tool designed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency for breast cancer detection by assisting physicians in the analysis of breast ultrasound images, through automated identification of suspicious lesions and characterization using quantitative scores and BI-RADS descriptors. Its methodology relies on distinct modules for image viewing, lesion identification, and lesion analysis, with clinical studies demonstrating improved reader performance in AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and reduced interpretation times when using the software.

Summary

BU-CAD is a software application designed to assist trained physicians in analyzing breast ultrasound images for patients with soft tissue breast lesions suspicious for cancer. The system comprises three main components: a Viewer for loading and managing multi-modality images (ultrasound and mammography), a Lesion Identification Module that automatically identifies regions of interest (ROIs) and lesion contours on ultrasound images, and a Lesion Analysis Module. This analysis module processes user-selected or software-identified ROIs from up to two orthogonal views to generate a score of lesion characteristics (SLC) indicating malignancy likelihood (ranging from 0-100, corresponding to BI-RADS 2-5), a corresponding BI-RADS category (2, 3, 4a/b/c, 5), and BI-RADS descriptors for lesion shape, orientation, margin, echo pattern, and posterior features. The software also supports image adjustment, measurement, documentation, and structured reporting, but is not intended for primary mammography interpretation or use on mobile devices. Clinical performance evaluations demonstrated BU-CAD's effectiveness in aiding diagnosis. A multi-reader multi-case (MRMC) study involving 628 cases and 16 readers (radiologists and breast surgeons) showed that physician performance, measured by the Area Under the Curve (AUC) of location-specific ROC, significantly improved from 0.7786 to 0.8160 when aided by BU-CAD (mean AUC shift +0.0374), alongside increases in sensitivity, specificity, and a notable reduction in interpretation time by approximately 40%. A standalone study on 1139 cases (from North America, Europe, and Taiwan) reported a standalone AUC_LROC of 0.8203 for BU-CAD, with its Lesion Identification Module (CADe) achieving 93.24% accuracy in identifying lesions. The Lesion Analysis Module (CADx) also demonstrated robustness, maintaining an AUC above 0.8 even when ROIs were systematically shrunk by up to 16%. However, BU-CAD has limitations, including non-use on post-surgical excision sites or images with Doppler/elastography overlays, and patient management decisions should not solely rely on its analysis.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Breast UltrasoundComputer-Assisted Detection (CADe)Computer-Assisted Diagnosis (CADx)Lesion CharacterizationBI-RADSRegion of Interest (ROI)Score of Lesion Characteristics (SLC)Artificial IntelligenceMRMC StudyClinical Performance

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K210670
Company
TaiHao Medical Inc.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
detection/diagnosis

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the BU-CAD algorithm differentiate between various BI-RADS descriptors (e.g., shape, margin, echo pattern) based on specific ultrasound image features, and what is its standalone accuracy for each individual descriptor compared to expert radiologist consensus?; What are the specific performance metrics (sensitivity, specificity, AUC) of the Lesion Identification Module when detecting very small lesions (e.g., <1 cm), particularly those with subtle or atypical sonographic features?; The study indicates a ~40% reduction in interpretation time; were potential long-term effects, such as reader fatigue, over-reliance on the software, or changes in unaided diagnostic skill, investigated?; How does the standalone AUC_LROC of 0.8203 for BU-CAD on the 1139-case dataset compare directly to the performance of experienced radiologists specializing in breast ultrasound interpreting the same dataset without AI assistance?; Regarding the limitation for use on sites of post-surgical excision, what specific image features, artifacts, or architectural distortions commonly found in post-surgical breast tissue interfere with the software's current analytical capabilities?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score5/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(algorithm, dataset)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
BU-CAD - TaiHao Medical Inc. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence