qER-Quant
Qure.ai Technologies • Radiology • 07/30/2021
Device Purpose
qER-Quant is an automated software tool designed to quantify critical brain structures like intracranial hyperdensities, lateral ventricles, and midline shift from non-contrast head CT scans using convolutional neural networks. Its methodology involves processing DICOM images to provide volumetric measurements and longitudinal analysis, aiming to support clinical assessment by automating and standardizing these quantifications.
Summary
qER-Quant is a software device designed for the automated analysis of non-contrast head CT (NCCT) scans. Its primary purpose is to automatically label, visualize, and quantify segmentable brain structures, thereby automating the traditionally manual process of identifying, labeling, and measuring the volume of these structures. The software analyzes NCCT images taken at a single time point to provide volumetric data. Additionally, it can perform longitudinal comparative analysis if multiple images from the same patient, acquired using the same scanner and protocol at different times, are available. The specific brain structures qER-Quant is indicated to analyze include intracranial hyperdensities, lateral ventricles, and midline shift, providing clinicians with quantitative metrics for these features. The qER-Quant system operates as standalone software, receiving NCCT scans in DICOM format from a Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) and returning its analysis results, in both PDF and DICOM formats, back to the PACS or another user-specified system. The core of its analytical capability lies in a set of pre-trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which process the DICOM images after a pre-processing stage and before a post-processing stage that generates visual and tabular outputs. Performance testing demonstrated its accuracy against manually labeled ground truth images, with reported mean absolute errors for intracranial hyperdensities at 6.56 ml (Dice score 0.75), midline shift at 1.37 mm, and lateral ventricles (left and right) at 2.09 ml (Dice 0.79) and 2.18 ml (Dice 0.75) respectively, meeting pre-set acceptance criteria.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the performance of qER-Quant's CNNs vary with different CT scanner manufacturers, models, or image acquisition parameters, given it operates on NCCT images?; What is the clinical impact of the reported mean absolute errors (e.g., 6.56 ml for intracranial hyperdensities) on diagnostic decision-making or patient management for the indicated conditions?; Since the predicate device Icobrain analyzes basal cisterns on NCCT while qER-Quant does not, what was the rationale for excluding this structure, and are there plans to include it in future iterations?; Could the longitudinal analysis feature of qER-Quant be adapted to predict the progression of conditions associated with changes in intracranial hyperdensities, lateral ventricle volume, or midline shift?; How does the system handle images with significant artifacts or atypical anatomy, and what are the failure modes or limitations of the CNN-based segmentation in such scenarios?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly