Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Koios DS

Koios Medical, Inc. • Radiology • 12/16/2021

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

Koios DS is an AI-powered software that analyzes ultrasound images of breast lesions and thyroid nodules to provide computer-assisted diagnostic information, enhancing physicians' decision-making. By employing distinct machine learning engines for breast (using BI-RADS/U1-U5 classifications) and thyroid (using TI-RADS/ATA classifications with an 'AI Adapter'), the system aims to improve diagnostic accuracy, increase consistency among interpreting physicians, and reduce image interpretation time for cancer risk assessment.

Summary

Koios DS is an artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) based software designed to assist trained interpreting physicians in analyzing ultrasound images of breast lesions and thyroid nodules suspicious for cancer. It functions as a web application where users select Regions of Interest (ROIs) from DICOM ultrasound images, which are then processed by distinct AI engines for breast and thyroid. For breast lesions, the software automatically classifies them based on image data into ACR BI-RADS® or European U1-U5 categories, displays a confidence level indicator, and identifies lesion shape and orientation; it also features 'Smart Click' for automated ROI generation and 'Smart Calipers' for ingesting caliper data. For thyroid nodules, Koios DS generates user-editable sonographic descriptor recommendations (Composition, Echogenicity, Shape, Margin, Echogenic Foci) and offers an optional deep-learning derived cancer risk assessment via the 'AI Adapter,' which modifies the final categorization in ACR TI-RADS™ or ATA risk stratification systems to improve diagnostic performance. Performance evaluations demonstrated notable improvements in diagnostic capabilities. The updated breast engine achieved an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 92.9% in bench testing on 900 lesions, representing a significant 5% increase in AUC and a 24% increase in specificity compared to its predicate. Clinical study data for breast functionality indicated that readers using Koios DS experienced a 0.037 AUC improvement and showed significantly increased inter-operator agreement and reduced intra-reader variability. The thyroid engine's 'AI Adapter,' when applied to ACR TI-RADS, yielded an AUC of 79.8% in bench tests. A multi-reader, multi-case clinical trial for thyroid functionality, involving 650 cases and 15 readers, showed a statistically significant improvement in average reader AUC by +0.083 (all readers/data) and +0.074 (US readers/US data) when using Koios DS. This was accompanied by enhanced sensitivity and specificity for Fine Needle Aspiration (FNA) and follow-up recommendations, and a reduction in interpretation time.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

AI/Machine LearningUltrasoundBreast LesionsThyroid NodulesComputer-Aided Diagnosis (CADx)DICOMRegion of Interest (ROI)BI-RADSTI-RADSDiagnostic Accuracy

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K212616
Company
Koios Medical, Inc.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
diagnosis

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the 'AI Adapter' for thyroid nodule analysis specifically modify the point-based or risk-shift categorizations in ACR TI-RADS and ATA RSSs, and what is the underlying mechanism for this modification?; What are the specific image features and machine learning algorithms utilized by the separate breast and thyroid AI engines to derive their respective classifications and risk assessments?; Given the significant AUC improvement with the updated breast engine (92.9% vs 88.2% for the predicate), what specific changes in the algorithm or training data contributed to this enhanced performance, particularly the 24% increase in specificity?; The document mentions 'Smart Click' for breast ROI generation; how does this automated ROI selection compare in accuracy and user workflow efficiency to manual ROI selection, and are there plans to extend this to thyroid analysis?; While the system reduces inter-operator variability, what is the range of performance improvement observed across readers with different levels of experience (e.g., radiologists vs. endocrinologists vs. surgeons as per the study participants for thyroid analysis)?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score5/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(training data, machine learning, algorithm)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Koios DS - Koios Medical, Inc. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence