Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Quantib ND

Quantib B.V. • Radiology • 01/14/2022

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

Quantib ND 2.0 is a medical imaging software that automates the segmentation and volumetric quantification of brain structures and white matter hyperintensities from MRI scans using an atlas-based methodology on the Quantib AI Node platform. It provides clinicians with quantitative data, visualizations, and longitudinal tracking to aid in the assessment and reporting of neurological conditions.

Summary

Quantib ND 2.0 is an advanced medical imaging processing software designed as an extension for the Quantib AI Node platform. Its primary purpose is the automatic labeling, visualization, and volumetric quantification of identifiable brain structures and white matter hyperintensities (WMH) derived from magnetic resonance (MR) images. The system processes 3D T1-weighted MR images for brain structure segmentation and requires an additional T2-weighted FLAIR MR image for WMH segmentation. It operates using a segmentation system based on multiple atlases, each comprising a 3D T1-weighted MR image and a corresponding label map that divides the MR image into distinct tissue segments. Quantib ND 2.0 provides quantitative information on both absolute and relative volumes of segmented regions and supports single time-point analysis as well as longitudinal analysis across two or more time-points. The outputs, including segmentations, visualizations, and volumetric measurements (which can be compared to reference centile data), are intended to offer complementary information to trained medical professionals, aiding them in the evaluation, assessment, and quantitative reporting of MR brain images. A key modification in Quantib ND 2.0 from its predicate (Quantib ND 1.5) is its integration with the Linux-based Quantib AI Node, transitioning from a Windows-based third-party platform, and adopting a server-client architecture accessible via a web browser. User interaction has been simplified; for instance, brain structure segmentation results are now directly added to reports as volumetric measures and overview images, with full segmentations exportable for detailed analysis. While the core algorithm design for segmentation remains consistent, the software architecture for integration has been updated. Performance validation compared automated segmentations to manual ones. For brain structures like brain tissue, CSF, ICV, hippocampus, and various lobes, Dice indices ranged from 0.78 (CSF) to 0.99 (Cerebellum), with absolute differences in relative volumes generally below 1.7 percentage points. For White Matter Hyperintensities, the average Dice overlap was 0.61 ± 0.13, and the absolute difference of relative volumes was 0.2 ± 0.2 percentage points, with WMH segmentation requiring user review and potential editing before validation. Reports and segmentations are automatically exported to a configured DICOM node.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

MRIBrain SegmentationVolumetric QuantificationWhite Matter Hyperintensities (WMH)Neuroimaging SoftwareAtlas-based SegmentationLongitudinal AnalysisDICOMImage ProcessingBrain Structures

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K213737
Company
Quantib B.V.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the algorithm's performance (e.g., Dice scores) for brain structure and WMH segmentation translate to clinical decision-making in specific neurological conditions?; What are the limitations of the atlas-based segmentation, especially in brains with significant atrophy, novel lesions, or anatomical variants not well-represented in the atlas dataset?; How robust is the longitudinal analysis to variations in MRI acquisition parameters and inter-scanner differences over time for the same patient?; What specific "reference centile data" is used for comparison of volumetric measurements, and how was this normative database established and validated for diverse populations?; Given the Dice index of 0.61 for White Matter Hyperintensities, what is the anticipated clinical impact of relying on user review and editing for these segmentations versus further algorithmic improvement?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(algorithm, dataset, labeling)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(server, platform)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Quantib ND - Quantib B.V. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence