HeartFlow Analysis
HeartFlow, Inc. • Cardiovascular • 10/14/2022
Device Purpose
The HeartFlow Analysis is an AI-based software device that processes patient-specific CT scan data to create a 3D model of the coronary arteries and simulate blood flow, providing non-invasive FFRct values and plaque characterization. Its purpose is to aid clinicians in the risk assessment, functional evaluation, and treatment planning of coronary artery disease by offering detailed anatomical and physiological insights derived from deep learning algorithms.
Summary
The HeartFlow Analysis is an AI-driven software medical device designed for the non-invasive quantitative and qualitative assessment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with suspected CAD. It utilizes previously acquired Computed Tomography (CT) DICOM data to generate a comprehensive analysis. The software employs deep learning algorithms, trained since 2015 on extensive CT datasets, to automatically extract anatomical data, identify and characterize plaque, and create a 3D model of the patient's coronary arteries from static CT images. Key functionalities include centerline detection, lumen boundary determination, the ability to model stenosis and plaque, and features like 'PreRead' for anatomy extraction and 'Planner' for modifying the anatomical model. From the 3D model, HeartFlow Analysis performs coronary physiological simulations to compute FFRct (Fractional Flow Reserve derived from CT). This involves calculating simulated pressure, velocity, and blood flow, providing hemodynamic information that, alongside anatomical details like percent stenosis and plaque volumes, aids in functional evaluation. The outputs, presented as graphics and text accessible via an internet-connected device, are intended to support qualified clinicians in risk stratification, diagnosis, and treatment planning for CAD. The system allows for clinician review and assessment of the analysis, which is meant to be used as a supplemental diagnostic aid in conjunction with other clinical information and professional judgment. Validation studies, including stress and repeatability testing using previously acquired diagnostic images, have indicated the device's acceptability for its intended use.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the AI algorithm's performance in plaque characterization and FFRct calculation compare to invasive FFR measurements across diverse patient populations and varying degrees of stenosis severity?; What specific deep learning architectures are employed, and how is the continuous learning from new CT data and studies managed to ensure algorithm robustness and prevent drift without compromising previously validated performance?; Can the HeartFlow Analysis differentiate between stable and vulnerable plaque characteristics, and if so, what is the validation data supporting this capability?; What is the impact of CT image quality variability (e.g., motion artifacts, calcium blooming) on the accuracy of the 3D model generation and subsequent FFRct values, and what are the quality control thresholds for input data?; How does the 'Planner' feature, which allows modification of the anatomic model to remove luminal narrowings, guide or predict outcomes of potential revascularization strategies, and what is its validated accuracy in such predictive modeling?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, VDR/VEX detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly