cvi42 Auto Imaging Software Application
Circle Cardiovascular Imaging Inc • Radiology • 07/28/2022
Device Purpose
cvi42 Auto is a software application designed to enhance cardiovascular diagnostics by utilizing machine learning for semi-automated quantitative analysis of cardiac MR and CT images, focusing on cardiac function, calcium assessment, and coronary artery evaluation. The system's methodology involves processing DICOM images with algorithms trained on diverse datasets, aiming to provide clinicians with accurate and efficient decision support tools, validated through performance testing that showed high classification and measurement accuracy.
Summary
cvi42 Auto is an advanced software as a medical device (SaMD) for viewing, post-processing, and evaluating cardiovascular magnetic resonance (MR) and computed tomography (CT) images. It aims to support physicians in qualitative assessment, quantitative measurements of cardiac structures and vessels, calcium scoring, and confirming physician-identified lesions. The core technology leverages machine learning for semi-automatic contouring of heart chambers in MR images for functional analysis, identifying calcified plaque in coronary arteries from non-contrast CT images, and placing centerlines in coronary vessels from CT images for stenosis assessment. These ML algorithms were trained on diverse, multi-site datasets to promote generalization, with distinct separation between training and validation data. The software includes a graphical user interface for comprehensive qualitative and quantitative analysis, including volume, mass, function, and signal intensity changes, with integrated reporting. It can also generate qualitative 3D views of the heart from CT data. cvi42 Auto processes DICOM files independently of the imaging equipment vendor. Performance validation on 235 patient images demonstrated strong results: CMR function analysis yielded 97-100% series classification accuracy and 5-10% volumetric Mean Absolute Error; calcium analysis achieved 86-99% classification performance; and coronary analysis showed 82-94% centerline performance. The machine learning functionalities are intended for adult patients, while manual tools are unrestricted.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the performance of the machine learning algorithms in cvi42 Auto for cardiac function (e.g., chamber segmentation) compare to expert manual segmentation in terms of inter-observer and intra-observer variability?; What specific types of machine learning models are employed for cardiac function, calcium assessment, and coronary analysis, and how were they optimized for diverse scanner and image parameters?; Given the validation dataset included images from 'major vendors,' what is the range of performance variation observed across different scanner manufacturers or imaging protocols for the semi-automated analyses?; How does the software address potential biases in the training data related to patient demographics or specific pathologies, and what steps are taken to ensure robustness and fairness across different patient populations not heavily represented in the training set?; What are the typical processing times for the semi-automated machine learning workflows (cardiac function, calcium assessment, coronary analysis) on standard clinical workstations, and how does this integrate into existing clinical reporting workflows?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly