BriefCase
Aidoc Medical, Ltd. • Radiology • 03/14/2022
Device Purpose
Aidoc's BriefCase is an artificial intelligence-powered software utilizing a deep-learning algorithm to analyze chest X-ray images from adult and transitional adolescent patients for suspected pneumothorax, aiming to enhance radiological triage. Its methodology involves processing DICOM images through a multi-component system (hospital server, cloud server, worklist application) to deliver timely, non-diagnostic notifications to clinicians, thereby facilitating prioritization within the standard clinical workflow without replacing direct image review.
Summary
Aidoc Medical's BriefCase is a radiological computer-aided triage and notification software designed for the analysis of Chest X-Ray images in adults and transitional adolescents aged 18 and older. Its purpose is to assist appropriately trained medical specialists in hospital networks with workflow triage by flagging and communicating suspected positive cases of Pneumothorax (Ptx). The methodology involves an artificial intelligence algorithm that analyzes DICOM images received and de-identified by an Aidoc Hospital Server, processed by an Aidoc Cloud Server, and then presented on an Aidoc Worklist Application; this system operates in parallel to standard image interpretation, providing notifications for suspect cases with compressed preview images intended for informational purposes only, not for diagnosis, and without altering the original medical image. The performance of BriefCase was evaluated in a retrospective, blinded, multicenter, multinational study using 619 chest X-ray cases (139 positive for Ptx, 480 negative), where the primary endpoint evaluating the software's ability to identify Pneumothorax yielded an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.969, a sensitivity of 94.2%, and a specificity of 90.8%. A secondary endpoint measured the mean time-to-notification for true positive cases as 13.1 seconds, and the study also reported a Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of 99.3% and a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 53.3%, suggesting the software's potential to facilitate earlier attention to suspect cases.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the AI algorithm's performance vary across different X-ray machine manufacturers and image acquisition settings, particularly those underrepresented in the pivotal study's dataset (e.g., specific Philips, GE Healthcare, Siemens models beyond the overall distribution)?; Beyond time-to-notification, what is the quantifiable impact of BriefCase integration on radiologist reading times per case, overall report turnaround times, and instances of delayed diagnosis for critical Pneumothorax cases in real-world clinical practice?; Given the Positive Predictive Value of 53.3%, what is the typical number of false positive notifications a radiologist might encounter per shift in a busy emergency department, and how does this affect alert fatigue and trust in the system?; Can the BriefCase algorithm provide any indication of Pneumothorax size or type (e.g., tension vs. simple), and how does its sensitivity and specificity break down for subtle or small Pneumothoraces compared to larger, more obvious ones?; What are the specific data characteristics (e.g., image quality parameters, patient demographic shifts, prevalence of co-occurring pathologies) that would trigger a need for retraining or recalibration of the BriefCase AI model to maintain its stated performance levels?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly