Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

AVIEW RT ACS

Coreline Soft Co.,Ltd • Radiology • 11/10/2022

510(k)IEC 62304 Class C
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

AVIEW RT ACS is a medical image processing system utilizing deep learning technology for automated segmentation of organs at risk from CT scans, designed to support radiotherapy planning. Its efficacy and generalization capabilities were established through rigorous performance testing against expert-derived gold standards and a predicate device, using metrics like Dice Similarity Coefficient and Hausdorff Distance on diverse patient datasets and imaging parameters.

Summary

AVIEW RT ACS, by Coreline Soft Co., Ltd., is a medical image processing system designed for auto-segmentation of organs using deep learning. It processes CT images (non-contrast and contrast) to assist in radiotherapy planning by delineating structures such as the lungs, heart, eyes, brain, mandible, kidneys, liver, femurs, and bladder. The system is intended for use by trained medical professionals, including radiation oncology physicians. The device's auto-segmentation performance was validated through a comparative study against a predicate device and a robust gold standard. This gold standard was meticulously developed by three radiation oncology physicians through a sequential editing process. The validation utilized a dataset of 120 CT cases, including both Korean and U.S. populations with diverse ethnic backgrounds. Evaluation metrics included the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and 95% Hausdorff Distance (HD), with sub-group analyses performed for different CT scanner vendors, slice thicknesses, and reconstruction kernels to assess the robustness and generalization of the segmentation algorithms across varied conditions.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

AVIEW RT ACSAuto-segmentationDeep LearningCT ImagesRadiotherapy PlanningOrgan SegmentationDice Similarity CoefficientHausdorff DistancePerformance ValidationMedical Image Processing

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K220408
Company
Coreline Soft Co.,Ltd
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Intervention
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. What specific deep learning architecture is employed in AVIEW RT ACS for organ segmentation, and how was it trained (e.g., dataset size for training, diversity of training data, annotation process for training data)?; How do the quantitative DSC and 95% HD values for AVIEW RT ACS on specific organs compare to inter-observer variability among human experts segmenting the same structures?; What is the typical processing time for auto-segmentation of a full CT dataset for each anatomical region (e.g., head & neck, pelvis), and what are the computational requirements (e.g., GPU, CPU, memory)?; Were there any specific organ types or image characteristics (e.g., post-contrast artifacts, presence of metallic implants, low image quality) where the auto-segmentation performance was notably degraded or required more significant manual correction?; Beyond the listed vendors, slice thicknesses, and kernels, what other factors of image acquisition or patient variability were assessed for their impact on segmentation performance?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(training data, deep learning, algorithm, dataset, annotation)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(server)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
AVIEW RT ACS - Coreline Soft Co.,Ltd | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence