AI100 with Shonit
SigTuple Technologies Pvt. Ltd. • Hematology • 09/19/2023
Device Purpose
The AI100 with Shonit™ is an automated cell-locating device intended to improve efficiency and standardization in hematological reviews by digitally imaging peripheral blood smears and pre-classifying white blood cells, red blood cells, and platelets. Its methodology relies on microscopic imaging, motorized slide scanning, and software-based image analysis to present cells for final verification by a trained operator, with studies demonstrating strong performance in cell identification and morphological assessment compared to manual microscopy techniques.
Summary
The AI100 with Shonit™ is an in-vitro diagnostic device designed for clinical laboratories to aid in hematological analysis. Its primary functions include performing differential counts of White Blood Cells (WBCs), characterizing Red Blood Cell (RBC) morphology, and assessing Platelet (PLT) morphology from peripheral blood smears. The device automates the process of locating blood cells on a prepared slide and presents digital images of these cells for review by a skilled operator, who then identifies and classifies each cell. The system utilizes a high-resolution microscope with LED illumination, a motorized XYZ stage for slide manipulation, and a camera to capture images. Software controls hardware operations, manages image data, analyzes images to pre-classify cells, and facilitates report generation. The operational principle of the AI100 with Shonit™ mirrors manual microscopy, beginning with the device scanning a peripheral blood smear (prepared with Romanowsky stain from a K2EDTA anticoagulated sample) to identify an optimal area for analysis. It then captures multiple Field of View (FOV) images in a spiral pattern, applying image processing algorithms to extract and pre-classify WBCs (into types like neutrophils, lymphocytes, blasts), RBCs (by size and shape like normocytes, macrocytes, target cells), and Platelets (normal, large, giant, clumps). Analytical performance studies demonstrated acceptable repeatability and reproducibility for WBC, RBC, and platelet parameters, meeting predefined criteria. Method comparison studies involving 882 samples showed strong agreement with manual microscopy for WBC differentials, RBC morphological characterization (anisocytosis, macrocytosis, poikilocytosis), and platelet morphology assessment, with high sensitivity and specificity for various abnormalities.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the AI100's 40X objective lens compare to systems using 100X oil immersion for resolving fine morphological details critical for identifying subtle dysplastic changes or rare cell types?; What is the typical processing time per slide, from loading to the availability of pre-classified images for operator review, and how does this compare to fully automated hematology analyzers or traditional manual review?; Given the device uses an outward spiral scanning pattern, how does it ensure comprehensive coverage of the optimal viewing area and avoid missing clinically significant cells that might be sparsely distributed?; The system currently does not interact with Laboratory Information Systems (LIS); what are the plans and timelines for LIS integration, and what data standards will be supported for future interoperability?; How does the image processing algorithm differentiate between various RBC poikilocytes (e.g., echinocytes vs. acanthocytes, or different types of fragmented cells) and what is its performance on samples with multiple co-existing RBC abnormalities?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, HBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly