BriefCase
Aidoc Medical, Ltd. • Radiology • 11/18/2022
Device Purpose
Aidoc's BriefCase is an artificial intelligence-driven software designed to analyze adult frontal chest X-rays, using a deep-learning algorithm to identify and notify clinicians about suspected vertical malposition of endotracheal tubes relative to the carina to expedite triage. The system processes DICOM images via cloud-based analysis and demonstrated high sensitivity (86.81%) and specificity (92.02%) in a multicenter study, significantly reducing the time-to-notification for potentially critical ETT placements compared to standard care.
Summary
Aidoc Medical's BriefCase is a radiological computer-aided triage and notification software designed for the analysis of frontal chest X-ray (CXR) images in adults and transitional adolescents aged 18 and older. Its primary purpose is to assist hospital networks and appropriately trained medical specialists in workflow triage by flagging and communicating suspected positive cases of vertically malpositioned endotracheal tubes (ETT) in relation to the carina, specifically when the ETT distal tip is assessed as being more than 5 cm above, less than 2 cm above, or below the carina. The system utilizes an artificial intelligence algorithm to process DICOM images, operating through distinct modules for image acquisition (Aidoc Hospital Server), cloud-based image processing (Aidoc Cloud Server), and workflow integration with notifications (Aidoc Desktop Application), all functioning in parallel to standard care without altering original images. The device's efficacy was established in a retrospective, multicenter pivotal study involving 921 CXR cases, where its performance was compared against a ground truth determined by a majority vote of three senior board-certified radiologists. BriefCase achieved a sensitivity of 86.81% and a specificity of 92.02% in identifying ETT malposition. A significant finding was the reduction in the mean time-to-notification to 4.93 minutes, substantially faster than the standard care's mean time-to-exam-open of 157.0 minutes. The device has limitations: it assesses only vertical ETT position, does not account for patient positioning, cannot detect esophageal intubation, fails if the carina is poorly visualized, and may generate false alerts for correctly positioned double lumen ETTs due to its inability to discriminate ETT types.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the algorithm's performance vary with different X-ray scanner manufacturers or image quality variations not extensively covered in the pivotal study?; What is the specific false positive rate and clinical impact for correctly positioned double lumen ETTs, and are there algorithmic adjustments planned to address this limitation?; To what extent does the presence of significant co-existing thoracic pathologies (e.g., large pleural effusions, severe atelectasis) affect the algorithm's ability to accurately identify the carina and ETT tip, and what is the failure analysis rate in such complex cases?; Could the approximately 5-minute processing and notification time be further optimized, and what are the primary bottlenecks in the image acquisition-to-notification pipeline (e.g., de-identification, cloud upload, analysis)?; Beyond time-to-notification, are there any data on how the use of BriefCase impacts downstream clinical outcomes or resource utilization, such as rates of re-intubation or length of ICU stay?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly