Transpara 1.7.2
ScreenPoint Medical B.V. • Radiology • 08/03/2022
Device Purpose
Transpara 1.7.2 is a software medical device utilizing deep learning algorithms to assist physicians in the detection and diagnosis of breast cancer from FFDM and DBT images. It aims to improve interpretive accuracy by providing computer-aided detection marks and quantitative scores for suspicious regions and overall exams, based on algorithms trained and validated on diverse radiological imaging data.
Summary
Transpara 1.7.2 is a radiological computer-assisted detection and diagnosis software designed to aid physicians in interpreting screening full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) exams. Its primary purpose is to identify regions suspicious for breast cancer and assess their likelihood of malignancy, serving as a concurrent reading aid. The system processes DICOM images from compatible FFDM and DBT systems, applying 'deep learning' algorithms trained on an extensive database of biopsy-proven breast cancers, benign abnormalities, and normal tissue. The software outputs computer-aided detection (CAD) marks for suspicious calcifications and soft-tissue lesions, region scores (0-100 scale indicating suspicion level), links between corresponding regions in different views, and an overall exam score (1-10 scale for cancer likelihood in the exam). Non-clinical standalone performance tests were conducted using an independent dataset of 10,690 exams (5,867 FFDM, 4,823 DBT), which included 1,472 cancer cases with varied morphologies (e.g., 56.5% mass, 26.1% calcifications) and histological types. For FFDM, Transpara 1.7.2 demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.0% at 0.30 false positives per image, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.945. For DBT, it achieved a sensitivity of 93.2% at 0.34 false positives per volume, with an AUC of 0.945. These tests showed its detection performance to be non-inferior to its predicate (Transpara 1.7.0); it is intended for use by qualified physicians as an adjunct tool, and patient management decisions should not be based solely on its analysis.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the 'deep learning' algorithm in Transpara 1.7.2 differentiate between various histological subtypes of breast cancer, and does its performance vary significantly among them?; What specific architectural changes were implemented in the algorithms for version 1.7.2 compared to 1.7.0 to achieve improved detection accuracy for DBT, particularly concerning different lesion types?; How does the exam score calibration, which aims for approximately 10 percent of non-cancer mammograms to fall into each of the 10 risk categories, account for variability in breast density and patient demographics across diverse populations?; What is the specific performance (sensitivity, false positive rate) of Transpara 1.7.2 in identifying architectural distortions and asymmetries, considering they represented only 4.0% of cancer regions in the test dataset?; Given that the user interface implementation is by third parties, what are the key technical requirements or best practices for integrating Transpara's DICOM output effectively into various PACS and medical workstations to optimize radiologist workflow?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly