MPXA-2000
Medipixel, Inc. • Radiology • 03/22/2023
Device Purpose
MPXA-2000 is a software application designed to assist clinicians by providing automated quantitative analysis of coronary arteries from X-ray angiographic images using deep learning and computer vision algorithms. It aims to improve the efficiency and reproducibility of assessing coronary artery disease in adult patients by automatically segmenting vessels, classifying them, and calculating key diagnostic parameters.
Summary
MPXA-2000 is a stand-alone cardiovascular image analysis software designed for the viewing and quantification of X-ray angiographic images of coronary arteries in adult patients with Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). Its primary purpose is to provide validated and reproducible quantified results to support clinical decision-making in diagnosis and treatment evaluation, though it is not intended as the sole basis for clinical diagnosis. The software utilizes a combination of deep learning algorithms for automatic vessel segmentation and classification (identifying LAD, LCX, and RCA vessel types) and computer vision algorithms for precise measurement of vessel dimensions from DICOM-formatted images. Key functionalities include image uploading, frame selection, automated analysis of regions of interest (ROIs), and visualization and export of these results. The MPXA-2000 system processes X-ray angiographic images to calculate metrics such as percent diameter stenosis, minimum lumen diameter (MLD), and reference diameters. Validation was performed using images from X-ray angiography systems by Philips Medical Systems, Siemens Healthineers, and GE Healthcare. Standalone performance testing on 305 coronary angiograms from a U.S. population demonstrated high accuracy, with a vessel classification accuracy of 0.9934 and a vessel segmentation Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) of 0.9200. The software's estimation of minimum luminal diameter was found to be comparable to its predicate device, QAngio XA. The analysis results can be exported in PDF or Excel formats for clinical review by cardiologists and radiologists.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the deep learning model in MPXA-2000 account for variability in image quality and patient anatomy to maintain its reported vessel segmentation accuracy of 0.9200 DSC across diverse clinical scenarios?; What specific features or algorithms contribute to MPXA-2000's ability to automatically classify LAD, LCX, and RCA vessel types with an accuracy of 0.9934, and how robust is this classification in atypical anatomies or poor contrast images?; Given that MPXA-2000 does not include stent analysis or ostium segmentation like its predicate QAngio XA, what is the clinical impact or workflow adjustment for users who previously relied on these features for comprehensive coronary assessment?; How does the real-time analysis capability of MPXA-2000, leveraging deep learning and computer vision, integrate into existing catheterization laboratory workflows, and what is the typical processing time per study?; Beyond the reported Dice Similarity Coefficient and classification accuracy, what are the performance metrics for specific quantitative measurements like Minimum Lumen Diameter or percent stenosis when compared against a gold standard, such as QCA performed by expert core labs, especially in complex lesion morphologies?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly