UltraSight AI Guidance
UltraSight Inc. • Radiology • 07/24/2023
Device Purpose
The UltraSight AI Guidance system is a software application designed to empower non-expert medical professionals to acquire standard cardiac ultrasound images by utilizing artificial intelligence. Its methodology involves real-time, on-screen visual cues for transducer manipulation and image quality assessment, based on machine learning algorithms trained to emulate sonographer expertise.
Summary
The UltraSight AI Guidance is a software accessory for compatible diagnostic ultrasound systems, designed to assist medical professionals without specialized sonography training in acquiring two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D-TTE) images from adult patients. It guides users through the acquisition of ten standard cardiac views (PLAX, PSAX-AV, PSAX-MV, PSAX-PM, AP4, AP5, AP2, AP3, SubC4, and SC-IVC). The system operates as a mobile application leveraging machine learning and artificial intelligence to provide dynamic, real-time instructions on transducer positioning and orientation. Key features include a "Quality Bar" that continuously scores image diagnosability based on ACEP guidelines, "View Detection" to identify if the heart is visible and guide navigation or signal to hold position, and "Probe Guidance" which offers on-screen graphical cues for transducer movements like rotation, tilt, rock, and slides, without explicit text instructions. Non-clinical performance testing validated the software according to IEC 62304 and demonstrated strong standalone performance for its AI algorithms: the Quality Bar achieved a mean AUC of 0.86 and PPV of 0.93 for diagnosability classification; View Detection showed a mean AUC of 0.988 for differentiating system states; and Probe Guidance cues achieved a mean AUC of 0.821. Human factors validation confirmed usability for intended users. Clinical performance was assessed in pilot and pivotal studies. The pivotal study involving 240 subjects showed that non-expert users, with UltraSight AI guidance, acquired images of sufficient quality for cardiologists to assess key cardiac parameters (LV size/function, RV size, pericardial effusion) in 93-100% of cases by majority agreement. Secondary endpoints also showed high rates of sufficient visual quality, affirming that non-expert users can acquire diagnostic-quality cardiac ultrasound clips.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the AI algorithm adapt to variations in patient anatomy or challenging acoustic windows not extensively covered in the training datasets?; What is the learning curve for non-expert users to achieve consistent diagnostic-quality image acquisition across all 10 cardiac views using the UltraSight AI Guidance?; Could the system's performance be further enhanced by integrating automated suggestions for adjusting ultrasound machine settings (e.g., depth, gain) in addition to transducer manipulation guidance?; What are the specific performance metrics (e.g., sensitivity, specificity) of the "View Detection" feature for differentiating between the 10 targeted cardiac views, especially in anatomically similar views?; How does the system's guidance accuracy and image quality output compare when used with different compatible ultrasound systems beyond the Philips Lumify S4-1 probe and Samsung Tab S6/S7 tablets?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly