Critical Care Suite with Pneumothorax Detection AI Algorithm, Critical Care Suite 2.1, Critical Care Suite
GE Medical Systems, LLC • Radiology • 05/25/2023
Device Purpose
The Critical Care Suite with Pneumothorax Detection AI Algorithm utilizes deep learning technology to analyze frontal chest X-rays, aiming to enhance the detection and localization of pneumothoraxes for qualified healthcare professionals. Clinical studies indicate the software improves diagnostic accuracy by flagging suspicious findings, providing localization overlays, and significantly increasing both sensitivity and specificity in identifying this critical condition across various users.
Summary
The Critical Care Suite with Pneumothorax Detection AI Algorithm is a software tool designed to assist healthcare professionals in identifying and localizing pneumothoraxes in frontal chest X-ray images from adult and transitional adolescent patients. It employs a deep learning artificial intelligence algorithm, trained on over 12,000 images, to automatically analyze radiographs. The system flags images with suspected pneumothorax, provides a visual overlay pinpointing the location, and indicates its confidence level in the finding. This software, deployable on various platforms like PACS and X-ray imaging systems, aims to streamline clinical workflows by enabling effective case prioritization and serving as a concurrent reading aid for radiologists and other qualified clinicians trained to assess pneumothoraxes. Clinical testing demonstrated the algorithm's standalone proficiency with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 96.1%, sensitivity of 84.3%, and specificity of 93.2% for pneumothorax detection. It showed high sensitivity for large (96.3%) and good sensitivity for small (75.0%) pneumothoraxes, with its localization overlay achieving 98.1% partial agreement and a DICE Similarity Coefficient of 0.705. A multi-reader, multi-case study involving radiologists, internal medicine physicians, emergency physicians, and nurse practitioners revealed that the algorithm significantly improved overall reader performance in detecting pneumothorax, increasing mean AUC by 14.5% (from 76.8% to 91.3%). Reader sensitivity rose by 16.3% and specificity by 12.4%, with notable improvements in detection for both large and small pneumothoraxes, and positive impacts observed across different clinical user groups, particularly for non-radiologists.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the algorithm's performance vary with different X-ray image acquisition parameters or equipment vendors not extensively represented in the training dataset?; What is the impact of the algorithm on turnaround time for pneumothorax diagnosis in real-world clinical settings beyond case prioritization?; Are there specific patient sub-populations (e.g., those with co-existing lung pathologies) where the algorithm's accuracy or localization capabilities are notably different?; How does the algorithm's 'confidence level' output correlate with the probability of a true positive, and how should clinicians best integrate this information into their decision-making?; What are the long-term effects on clinician skill and diagnostic accuracy if they consistently rely on this AI aid, particularly for less experienced users or in differentiating subtle cases?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly