BraveCX
Bering Ltd • Radiology • 11/09/2023
Device Purpose
BraveCX is an artificial intelligence-powered software designed to enhance radiological workflows by rapidly analyzing adult chest X-rays for signs of pleural effusion and pneumothorax. Its deep learning algorithm provides passive notifications to PACS/workstations, enabling prioritization of potentially critical cases for review by clinicians, without making standalone diagnostic claims.
Summary
BraveCX is a radiological computer-assisted triage and notification software designed to analyze adult chest X-ray images, encompassing both Anteroposterior (AP) and Posteroanterior (PA) views, for suspected critical findings, specifically pleural effusion and pneumothorax. It utilizes a Deep Learning Artificial Intelligence (AI) algorithm to identify features suggestive of these conditions from DICOM images. The software integrates into existing clinical workflows by receiving these images, analyzing them, and providing a case-level output, denoted as a "flag" or "(blank)", to Picture Archiving and Communication Systems (PACS) or workstations. This output facilitates worklist prioritization, enabling healthcare professionals, such as radiologists or other appropriately trained clinicians, to group potentially critical exams for earlier review. BraveCX operates as a passive notification tool, meaning it does not send direct, proactive alerts to specialists, and its results are intended to aid in prioritization rather than serve as a standalone basis for clinical decision-making. The performance of BraveCX was rigorously evaluated through both internal testing and extensive external independent testing utilizing large, diverse datasets such as MIMIC-CXR, NIH-CXR, and CheXpert, which represent the US population, with ground truths established by board-certified radiologists. In the external validation studies, for pleural effusion (based on 2,509 images, 867 positive), BraveCX achieved a Receiver Operating Characteristic Area Under the Curve (ROC AUC) of 0.988, a sensitivity of 92.62%, and a specificity of 98.11%. For pneumothorax (based on 3,245 images, 2,114 positive), the software demonstrated a ROC AUC of 0.972, a sensitivity of 93.38%, and a specificity of 97.27%. These performance metrics were found to be robust and unaffected by variables such as chest X-ray view position, patient sex, age quartiles, BMI quartiles, and various ethnicities. Furthermore, BraveCX demonstrated efficient processing, with a time-to-notification to the worklist ranging from approximately 4.8 to 10.4 seconds for simultaneous prediction of both conditions.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the BraveCX algorithm's performance vary with different X-ray equipment manufacturers and image acquisition protocols not extensively represented in the training/testing datasets?; What is the real-world impact on radiologist reading times and diagnostic accuracy for pleural effusion and pneumothorax when BraveCX is integrated into a clinical workflow compared to standard care without AI triage?; Given the passive notification system, what are the optimal strategies for integrating BraveCX flags into diverse PACS/workstation environments to ensure effective worklist prioritization without causing alert fatigue or workflow disruption?; Could the underlying AI model of BraveCX be adapted or retrained to identify other critical thoracic pathologies with similar accuracy, and what would be the data requirements for such an expansion?; How does the algorithm handle edge cases or images with multiple concurrent pathologies, and does the presence of other findings affect its accuracy for detecting pleural effusion or pneumothorax?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly