Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Annalise Enterprise CTB Triage-OH

Annalise-AI Pty Ltd • Radiology • 08/15/2023

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The Annalise Enterprise CTB Triage -OH is an AI-powered software designed to enhance radiology workflow by identifying potential obstructive hydrocephalus in adult non-contrast brain CT scans. It utilizes a deep-learning convolutional neural network to analyze images and alert clinicians for prioritized review, demonstrating high sensitivity and specificity in performance testing.

Summary

The Annalise Enterprise CTB Triage -OH is a software tool designed to assist clinicians in managing non-contrast brain CT studies for adult patients aged 22 years and older. Its primary function is to aid in the triage and prioritization of studies that exhibit features suggestive of obstructive hydrocephalus. The system analyzes these CT scans using an artificial intelligence algorithm and provides study-level notifications to existing order and imaging management systems, such as PACS/RIS. This facilitates earlier review of potentially critical cases by reordering the worklist, though it is explicitly stated that the device never downgrades a study's existing priority. It is intended for use by trained clinicians qualified to interpret brain CTs and operates in parallel with standard clinical workflows, serving as an aid rather than a standalone diagnostic tool or a means to rule out findings. The core technology is an artificial intelligence algorithm, specifically a convolutional neural network developed using deep-learning techniques. This network was trained on an extensive dataset of over 200,000 CT brain studies, which were annotated by radiologists and included images from a variety of scanner manufacturers. The device's performance was validated through a retrospective standalone study comparing its findings against a ground truth established by board-certified neuroradiologists. For obstructive hydrocephalus, the device demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity across different CT slice thicknesses; for instance, with a slice thickness of ≤ 1.5 mm at one operating point, sensitivity was 97.3% and specificity was 94.0%. A separate bench study also assessed triage effectiveness, reporting an average turn-around time of approximately 81.6 seconds for identifying and prioritizing cases.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Artificial IntelligenceCT Brain TriageObstructive HydrocephalusConvolutional Neural NetworkRadiological SoftwareWorklist PrioritizationNon-contrast CTDeep LearningClinical Decision SupportNeuroradiology

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K231094
Company
Annalise-AI Pty Ltd
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
triage

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the algorithm's performance vary with different severities or subtle presentations of obstructive hydrocephalus within the 'positive' cases?; What was the inter-rater reliability among the neuroradiologists establishing the ground truth, and how were discrepancies resolved beyond requiring a third truther?; Were there specific types of co-existing pathologies or image artifacts that most frequently impacted the algorithm's accuracy for obstructive hydrocephalus?; How does the device's performance generalize to CT scanners not heavily represented in the pivotal study or to patient populations with different demographic distributions than the test set?; What is the computational time required for the AI to analyze a typical CT brain study, and how does this integrate into the overall reported triage turn-around time of 81.6 seconds?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(machine learning, deep learning, neural network, algorithm, dataset)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(network)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Annalise Enterprise CTB Triage-OH - Annalise-AI Pty Ltd | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence