Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

iCAS-LV

HighRAD Ltd. • Radiology • 03/01/2024

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The iCAS-LV is a software device designed to aid physicians in the evaluation of liver lesions from CT scans by providing tools for image processing, including AI-driven segmentation and volumetric analysis. Its methodology involves integrating with PACS, utilizing 3D U-Net models for lesion segmentation, and enabling quantitative assessment of lesion characteristics and changes over time to support clinical evaluation.

Summary

The iCAS-LV is a PC-based, noninvasive image analysis software application designed to assist trained physicians in evaluating physician-identified liver lesions from CT scans. It receives multi-phase volume datasets of reconstructed CT studies from PACS devices, processes them using a suite of tools for visualization, measurement, segmentation, annotation, image registration, and reporting, and then transfers the processed output back to PACS in DICOM format. The software's workflow involves generating liver regions of interest from prior and current scans, registering these ROIs using deformable registration, and employing 3D U-Net models for lesion segmentation, which radiologists then review and can manually correct. It also facilitates semi-automatic matching of lesions between scans and quantifies changes in lesion volume and diameter over time. The system utilizes a deep learning algorithm (3D U-Net models) for lesion segmentation and supports a pipeline that includes supervised automatic liver registration and semi-automatic lesion matching. Performance was evaluated through phantom studies and clinical data analysis. Phantom tests demonstrated that iCAS-LV's volume and diameter estimations for spheres were comparable or slightly better than those of expert radiologists across multiple CT scanner platforms (GE, Philips, Siemens, Canon). Standalone clinical performance testing, using a retrospective multi-site dataset of 108 patients and 2,127 liver lesions, showed that physician-assisted iCAS-LV assessments of 3D lesion volumetrics agreed with ground truth established by three radiologists, supporting its utility based on metrics like DICE, ASSD, SHD, volume, and RECIST measurements. The device is intended to support physicians but not for isolated diagnosis or patient management decisions.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

iCAS-LVLiver LesionsCT Image AnalysisImage SegmentationVolumetric AnalysisDICOM3D U-NetImage RegistrationLongitudinal AnalysisPACS Integration

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K231690
Company
HighRAD Ltd.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the performance of the 3D U-Net model for liver lesion segmentation vary with lesion morphology, size, and proximity to vascular structures or other organs?; What is the typical time saved by a radiologist when using iCAS-LV for a complex case with multiple liver lesions compared to manual assessment methods?; How does the semi-automatic lesion matching algorithm handle challenging cases, such as significant changes in liver morphology or lesion appearance between scans?; What specific training is recommended for physicians to achieve optimal proficiency and ensure accurate use of the iCAS-LV, particularly for manual correction of segmentations?; Are there plans to extend the iCAS-LV's capabilities to other organs or imaging modalities beyond CT for liver lesions?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Post-§524B but no clear network capability detected

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score25/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Postmarket Plan✓ Detected in Summary
§524B ApplicableYes

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(deep learning, algorithm, dataset, ground truth, annotation)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(platform)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• SBOM not mentioned in AI-generated device summary. Under §524B (effective Oct 2023), cyber devices must provide a SBOM.

• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
iCAS-LV - HighRAD Ltd. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence