Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System

Philips Ultrasound • Radiology • 10/26/2023

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System is a versatile, mobile imaging platform now incorporating an AI-driven Auto EF Quantification feature for enhanced cardiac assessment. This technology leverages a neural network based on the LVivo EF algorithm to automatically measure left ventricular ejection fraction, end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume from apical four-chamber views, with clinical studies confirming its strong correlation to manual methods.

Summary

The Philips Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System is a mobile, software-controlled medical device designed for acquiring and displaying high-resolution ultrasound data in B (2D), Pulsed Wave Doppler, Color Doppler, Combined (B+Color), and M-modes. It utilizes commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) Android or iOS mobile devices, Philips Ultrasound Lumify software, and specific Philips USB transducers (C5-2 Curved array, L12-4 Linear array, S4-1 Sector array). The system is intended for diagnostic ultrasound imaging and fluid flow analysis across a wide range of applications, including fetal/obstetric, abdominal, pediatric, cardiac, and lung imaging, operated by healthcare professionals in various healthcare environments. A key enhancement to the Lumify system is the Auto EF Quantification feature, an artificial intelligence (AI) based technology available on version 5.0 (Android) specifically for cardiac imaging with the S4-1 transducer. Derived from DiA's LVivo EF algorithm, this feature automates the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (EF), end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV) from apical four-chamber (A4CH) views. The software automatically traces and tracks LV borders, provides an editing functionality for user review and adjustment, and includes a mechanism for rejecting false results. Clinical performance data, based on a study of 80 patients, demonstrated strong correlations between the automated LVivo EF measurements and manual tracing results for EF (r=0.82), EDV (r=0.95), and ESV (r=0.94), with the algorithm successfully processing 95% of the clips.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

LumifyDiagnostic UltrasoundAuto EF QuantificationArtificial IntelligenceCardiac ImagingEjection FractionLeft VentricleEnd Diastolic Volume (EDV)End Systolic Volume (ESV)Mobile Ultrasound

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K232500
Company
Philips Ultrasound
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the Auto EF algorithm's performance vary across different ultrasound image qualities or in patients with complex cardiac pathologies not extensively covered in the 80-patient study?; What specific criteria trigger the automated rejection of false results by the Auto EF feature, and what is its documented false positive/negative rate for this rejection mechanism?; What was the reported inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for the manual tracings used as the reference standard in the clinical performance study for Ejection Fraction, End Diastolic Volume, and End Systolic Volume?; How does the processing time for Auto EF Quantification compare to manual assessment in a typical clinical workflow, and what is the impact on overall examination time?; Are there plans to expand the Auto EF Quantification feature to other cardiac views beyond the apical four-chamber view or to other ultrasound transducers within the Lumify system?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score15/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not mentioned in summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(neural network, algorithm)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(network, platform)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials(environment)
✓ Detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Lumify Diagnostic Ultrasound System - Philips Ultrasound | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence