Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm

Anumana, Inc. • Cardiovascular • 09/28/2023

510(k)IEC 62304 Class C
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm is a software tool designed to screen adults at risk for heart failure by identifying a Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) of 40% or less using an artificial intelligence algorithm. This algorithm analyzes 10 seconds of a standard 12-lead ECG to provide a rapid prediction, aiding clinicians in determining the need for further cardiac evaluation.

Summary

The Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm is a software medical device designed to aid in screening for Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to 40% in adult patients at risk for heart failure, including those with cardiomyopathies, post-myocardial infarction, aortic stenosis, chronic atrial fibrillation, receiving cardiotoxic therapies, and postpartum women. The device employs an artificial intelligence-based algorithm that interprets 10 seconds of voltage times series data from a standard 12-lead ECG acquisition. This machine learning model, trained using a large cohort from Mayo Clinic with paired ECG and transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) data, aims to provide a point-of-care screening tool. The algorithm's output (e.g., "Low LVEF Detected") is provided to third-party software for display, assisting clinicians in decisions for further cardiac evaluation, but is not intended for standalone diagnosis, patient monitoring, or use with paced rhythms. Clinical validation was conducted via a retrospective study of 16,000 patient records across four diverse U.S. health systems, analyzing 13,960 patient-ECG pairs after exclusions. The algorithm demonstrated a sensitivity of 84.5% (95% CI: 82.2%-86.6%) and a specificity of 83.6% (95% CI: 82.9%-84.2%) for detecting LVEF ≤ 40%. It achieved a positive predictive value of 30.5% (95% CI: 28.8%-32.1%) and a negative predictive value of 98.4% (95% CI: 98.2%-98.7%) in a population with 7.9% prevalence of low LVEF. The training dataset comprised 93,722 patients, where the algorithm showed 85.7% sensitivity and 84.2% specificity in a set-aside test set. Subgroup analyses revealed performance variations across age groups, BMI strata, and in patients with prior histories of heart failure, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization, although overall performance remained robust.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Low Ejection FractionAI-ECG AlgorithmHeart Failure Screening12-lead ECG AnalysisLVEF <= 40%Machine LearningClinical ValidationSensitivitySpecificityPredictive Value

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K232699
Company
Anumana, Inc.
Panel
Cardiovascular
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Signals
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
diagnosis

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the algorithm's performance vary with different ECG machine models beyond the four tested in the clinical validation?; What are the specific electrocardiographic features or patterns the AI algorithm identifies as most predictive of low LVEF from the 10-second ECG strip?; Given the observed variations in diagnostic performance across age groups, BMI strata, and patients with specific prior cardiac conditions, what strategies are being considered to refine the algorithm or provide clinician guidance for these subgroups?; How does the algorithm account for, or how is its performance affected by, common comorbidities (e.g., hypertension, diabetes) or medications (other than cardiotoxic ones listed) that might influence ECG morphology in the target population?; What is the anticipated real-world impact on clinical workflow, time-to-diagnosis, and subsequent patient management pathways when this AI tool is integrated into primary care, urgent care, and emergency settings?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Authorized before §524B enforcement

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score45/100
SBOM Evidence✓ Detected in Summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not mentioned in summary
Postmarket Plan✓ Detected in Summary
§524B ApplicableNo

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials(third-party software)
✓ Detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(training data, machine learning, algorithm, dataset, test set)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of SBOM, ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• This device was authorized before §524B took effect. Cybersecurity evidence requirements were less prescriptive at the time.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Low Ejection Fraction AI-ECG Algorithm - Anumana, Inc. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence