Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

HealthFLD

Nano-X AI Ltd. • Radiology • 02/08/2024

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

HealthFLD is an AI-powered image processing software designed to provide quantitative analysis of liver attenuation from CT scans, aiding clinicians in the assessment of fatty liver. The methodology involves deep-learning based liver segmentation and Hounsfield Unit measurement, with performance validated through high agreement with radiologist-established ground truth and specific thresholds for contrast and non-contrast studies.

Summary

HealthFLD is an image processing software designed to assist clinicians in the evaluation and assessment of Fatty Liver. It analyzes computed tomography (CT) images, both non-contrast and contrast-enhanced, to provide quantitative and qualitative measurements of liver attenuation, specifically the mean Hounsfield Units (HU) in a region of interest. The software utilizes a deep-learning algorithm for liver segmentation and automatically adjusts its display threshold for liver attenuation based on whether a portal venous contrast phase is detected (<40 HU for non-contrast/non-portal venous phase, <75 HU if portal venous phase identified). Key software modules include DICOM data input and validation, the core HealthFLD algorithm for analysis, an integration feature for results output to a hosting application, and an error reporting system. The HealthFLD software is indicated for patients aged 18 to 75 undergoing CT scans for any clinical indication, provided the scan includes a significant portion of the liver. It is important to note that HealthFLD is not intended to provide a definitive diagnosis or risk assessment of fatty liver disease but rather to support clinical evaluation. Performance validation was conducted via a retrospective study involving 250 CT scans, comparing HealthFLD's measurements against ground truth established by three board-certified radiologists. The software demonstrated high agreement with ground truth for liver attenuation thresholds (95.98% for <40HU vs ≥40HU; 98.39% for <50HU vs ≥50HU) and accurate identification of portal venous phase (95.98% agreement). Bland-Altman analysis showed acceptable limits of agreement for liver density bias ([-7.80HU, 7.00HU]), confirming its intended performance.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

HealthFLDLiver AttenuationFatty LiverCT ScanImage Processing SoftwareHounsfield Units (HU)Deep LearningQuantitative AnalysisLiver SegmentationClinical Decision Support

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K233080
Company
Nano-X AI Ltd.
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the HealthFLD algorithm's performance in liver segmentation and HU measurement vary across different CT scanner models, manufacturers, and reconstruction kernels not explicitly detailed in the validation dataset?; What is the impact of varying levels of image noise or artifacts, commonly encountered in clinical CT scans, on the accuracy and reliability of HealthFLD's liver attenuation measurements?; Given the automatic adjustment of display thresholds based on portal venous phase detection (from <40 HU to <75 HU), what is the sensitivity and specificity of the algorithm in correctly identifying this phase, and how does misidentification impact the clinical utility of the attenuation measurement?; How does the software handle CT scans with partial liver coverage, and what is the minimum liver volume or specific anatomical landmarks required for reliable analysis?; Beyond mean HU, does HealthFLD provide any information on the heterogeneity of fat distribution within the liver, which could be clinically relevant for assessing patterns of steatosis?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Post-§524B but no clear network capability detected

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score5/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
§524B ApplicableYes

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(deep learning, algorithm, dataset, ground truth, bias)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• SBOM not mentioned in AI-generated device summary. Under §524B (effective Oct 2023), cyber devices must provide a SBOM.

• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
HealthFLD - Nano-X AI Ltd. | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence