Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

CardIQ Suite

GE Medical Systems SCS • Radiology • 08/01/2024

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

CardIQ Suite is a non-invasive software application designed to enhance the diagnosis and management of cardiovascular diseases by analyzing CT cardiac DICOM data. It employs advanced image processing, including new deep learning algorithms for automated segmentation, labeling, and quantification of cardiac structures and calcifications, thereby aiming to improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency for clinicians.

Summary

CardIQ Suite is a non-invasive software application designed to analyze cardiovascular anatomy and pathology using 2D or 3D CT cardiac DICOM data, including both non-contrast and angiography images. Its primary purpose is to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and determination of treatment paths for various cardiovascular diseases, such as coronary artery disease, by providing tools for the visualization and measurement of vessels, assessment of chamber mobility, and follow-up for interventions like stent placement and bypasses. The software offers comprehensive calcium scoring capabilities, employing a deep learning algorithm for automatic segmentation and labeling of calcified plaques in coronary arteries, heart valves, and the aorta, utilizing standard Agatston/Janowitz and Volume scoring methods. It also allows for manual lesion scoring and editing, with results exportable in DICOM SR format. The CardIQ Suite leverages advanced image processing, centrally featuring new deep learning algorithms to enhance workflow efficiency for several critical functions. These AI-driven enhancements include automated segmentation of the heart for 3D volume rendering, automatic segmentation of the coronary tree, precise tracking of coronary centerlines, and accurate labeling of coronary arteries, functionalities which were previously manual or employed traditional algorithms in earlier versions or reference devices. The software also provides Multi-Planar Reformat (MPR) Cardiac Review tools with cine capabilities for dynamic visualization of cardiac structures. Non-clinical bench testing successfully validated the performance of these four new deep learning algorithms. Furthermore, a clinical reader study confirmed their practical utility, demonstrating that the automated outputs for heart and coronary analysis were deemed acceptable in over 90% of evaluated cases with good image quality, supporting the claim of improved workflow efficiency.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

Cardiovascular CTDICOMDeep LearningCalcium ScoringCoronary Artery DiseaseImage Analysis Software3D Cardiac VisualizationAutomated SegmentationWorkflow EfficiencyQuantitative Cardiology

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K233731
Company
GE Medical Systems SCS
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Analysis
AI Subclass
quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the performance (accuracy, processing time) of the new deep learning algorithms for heart and coronary segmentation compare quantitatively to the traditional algorithms used in the reference device (K073138) across diverse patient populations and image qualities?; What specific training datasets and validation methodologies were employed for the four new deep learning algorithms, and what is their robustness against variations in CT acquisition protocols (e.g., scanner types, contrast timing, radiation dose)?; Beyond workflow efficiency, does the enhanced automated segmentation and labeling provided by CardIQ Suite lead to improved inter-observer and intra-observer variability in measurements and diagnostic interpretations compared to manual or semi-automated methods?; What are the specific limitations of the deep learning algorithms, particularly in cases of atypical anatomy, severe artifact presence, or complex pathologies, and what are the recommended user interventions or manual override procedures in such scenarios?; How does the "Adaptive Volume scoring" method for calcium scoring differ from the standard Volume scoring, and what is the clinical evidence supporting its diagnostic or prognostic value?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Post-§524B but no clear network capability detected

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score10/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
§524B ApplicableYes

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(training data, deep learning, algorithm, dataset, labeling)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(server)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• SBOM not mentioned in AI-generated device summary. Under §524B (effective Oct 2023), cyber devices must provide a SBOM.

• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
CardIQ Suite - GE Medical Systems SCS | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence