Huxley SANSA Home Sleep Apnea Test (1000-00)
Huxley Medical • Anesthesiology • 07/15/2024
Device Purpose
The Huxley SANSA Home Sleep Apnea Test is a chest-worn wearable device employing PPG, ECG, and accelerometer sensors to record various biophysical parameters for adults suspected of sleep apnea. It utilizes a cloud-based AI/ML algorithm to analyze this data, providing outputs like the Apnea-Hypopnea Index and Total Sleep Time to aid healthcare professionals in evaluating sleep-related breathing disorders.
Summary
The Huxley SANSA Home Sleep Apnea Test (HSAT) is a prescription-only wearable device designed for adults suspected of having sleep apnea. It aids in evaluating sleep-related breathing disorders by recording, analyzing, and storing biophysical parameters. The system utilizes a single patch worn on the chest, incorporating a reflective photoplethysmography (PPG) sensor, a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) sensor, and a 3-axis accelerometer. It collects data on oximetry, heart rate, chest movement, snoring, body position, respiratory effort, actigraphy, and sleep staging (sleep/wake), with the ECG channel serving as a reference. The device is intended for use in both clinical and home settings under the direction of a healthcare professional, with each study lasting approximately 10 hours. Data gathered by the SANSA HSAT is transferred via USB to a cloud-based software platform where an algorithm, combining signal processing and AI/Machine Learning components, computes time-series data and summary metrics, including the sansa-Apnea Hypopnea Index (sAHI) and Total Sleep Time (TST). Clinical performance data indicated SpO2 measurement accuracy with an overall average root mean square error (ARMS) of 2.4% (ranging from 1.7% to 3.7% across different Fitzpatrick skin tone subgroups) against arterial blood gas samples. In a comparison study with polysomnography (PSG) involving 533 participants, the device demonstrated a sensitivity of 88.2% and a specificity of 87.3% for diagnosing moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing. Subgroup analyses showed varied performance across race, Fitzpatrick skin tone, and BMI. The AI-based sleep/wake classification algorithm showed a sensitivity (sleep) of 95% and specificity (sleep) of 63%.
AI Regulatory Concerns
Powered by
Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.
Keywords
Device Metadata
Relevant Clinical Questions
- Q1. How does the AI/ML algorithm differentiate between various types of respiratory events (e.g., obstructive versus central apneas/hypopneas) using the collected sensor data, particularly without direct airflow measurement?; What is the impact of the reported 63% specificity for sleep staging on the accuracy of the total sleep time (TST) and subsequently the sansa-Apnea Hypopnea Index (sAHI) calculation, especially in patients with highly fragmented sleep?; Given the variability in SpO2 accuracy across Fitzpatrick skin tones (ARMS 3.7 for types 3-4 vs. 1.7 for types 5-6), what specific algorithm adjustments or sensor characteristics contribute to this performance, and are there further plans to optimize accuracy consistently across all skin tones?; The ECG channel is designated for reference only; what specific data or patterns from this reference ECG contribute to the AI/ML algorithm's assessment of sleep-related breathing disorders or other reported parameters, if it's not used for cardiac diagnostic purposes?; Considering the diagnostic sensitivity for moderate to severe sleep-disordered breathing was 66.7% in individuals with Fitzpatrick skin tones 5-6, what are the potential clinical implications for this subgroup, and how does this compare to other home sleep apnea tests using similar sensor technologies?
Risk Classification
ESL AnalysisFDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class C (software safety classification); Qualifies as a cyber device under §524B (post-Dec 2023, networked)
Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →Cybersecurity Evidence
Powered by SBOMator™Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.
Supply Chain BOM Evidence
Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.
Analysis:
• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.
• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, HBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.
• SBOM not mentioned in AI-generated device summary. Under §524B (effective Oct 2023), cyber devices must provide a SBOM.
• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.
• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.
Preparing a similar submission?
ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.
Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly