Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

Aplio i900/i800/i700 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Software V7.0 (TUS-AI900, TUS-AI800, TUS-AI700)

Canon Medical Systems Corporation • Radiology • 09/12/2024

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The Aplio i900/i800/i700 Diagnostic Ultrasound System with Software V7.0 aims to enhance diagnostic imaging across diverse clinical applications by utilizing multi-modal ultrasound technology. Its updated software incorporates deep learning algorithms to automate and streamline cardiac assessments, specifically improving workflow efficiency and quantitative analysis through features like automated plane detection and Doppler waveform tracing, validated for accuracy and time-saving benefits.

Summary

The Aplio i900/i800/i700 Diagnostic Ultrasound Systems, with Software V7.0, are mobile devices designed for visualizing internal body structures and dynamic processes to aid in diagnosis across a wide spectrum of clinical applications. These applications include fetal, abdominal, pediatric, cardiac, vascular, musculoskeletal, and small organ imaging, among others. The systems utilize various ultrasound probes (linear, convex, sector arrays) operating between approximately 2MHz and 33MHz to generate high-quality images in multiple modes such as B-mode, M-mode, Doppler (Color, Pulsed Wave, Continuous Wave, Power), Speckle-tracking, Tissue Harmonic Imaging, Shear wave, Elastography, and Acoustic attenuation mapping. They are intended for use by trained medical professionals in hospital and clinical environments. Software V7.0 introduces significant enhancements, primarily leveraging deep learning methodologies to improve cardiac assessment workflows and efficiency. Key new features include Auto Plane Detection for automatic selection of standard cardiac views (A4C, A2C, A3C, SAX) with over 90% agreement with expert sonographers; Quick Strain, which, when used with Auto Plane Detection, reduces wall motion tracking operation time by an average of 68% while maintaining result accuracy for EDV, ESV, EF, and GLS. Furthermore, Auto LVOT and Auto AoV features automate the tracing of LVOT and aortic valve Doppler waveforms, respectively, reducing operation times by approximately 78% and 71% without compromising measurement precision compared to manual methods. The software also expands 2D Wall Motion Tracking capabilities to the right ventricle and right atrium. Validation studies on U.S. clinical patient data confirmed these features perform effectively across diverse patient demographics and disease severities, meeting predefined acceptance criteria for accuracy and workflow improvement.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

UltrasoundDiagnostic ImagingSoftware V7.0Deep LearningCardiac ImagingWall Motion TrackingDopplerWorkflow EfficiencyAuto Plane DetectionQuantitative Analysis

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K241582
Company
Canon Medical Systems Corporation
Panel
Radiology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
Images
Clinical Function
Assessment
AI Function
Generation|Analysis
AI Subclass
acquisition guidance|quantification/feature localization

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the performance of the Auto Plane Detection feature vary in patients with atypical cardiac anatomy or rare pathologies not extensively represented in the validation dataset?; What is the learning curve for sonographers to effectively utilize and trust the new automated features like Auto LVOT and Auto AoV, and how does it impact overall exam consistency across different users?; Beyond time savings, what is the quantifiable impact of Quick Strain on inter-observer variability for measurements like EF and GLS compared to the conventional WMT workflow?; Are there specific patient populations or image quality scenarios where the deep learning algorithms for Auto Plane Detection, Auto LVOT, or Auto AoV show reduced accuracy or require manual override more frequently?; Given the expansion of Wall Motion Tracking to the right ventricle (2D WMT RV) and right atrium (2D WMT RA), what new diagnostic insights or prognostic capabilities are anticipated from these extended functionalities?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Post-§524B but no clear network capability detected

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score15/100
SBOM Evidence⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Postmarket Plan⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
§524B ApplicableYes

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(deep learning, algorithm, dataset)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials(server)
✓ Detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials
- Not detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials(environment)
✓ Detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of ML-BOM, SaaSBOM, OBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• SBOM not mentioned in AI-generated device summary. Under §524B (effective Oct 2023), cyber devices must provide a SBOM.

• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.

• Postmarket cybersecurity monitoring plan not clearly documented in AI-generated device summary.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SBOM, HBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
Aplio i900/i800/i700 Diagnostic Ultrasound System, Software V7.0 (TUS-AI900, TUS-AI800, TUS-AI700) - Canon Medical Systems Corporation | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence