Medscape Medical NewsAll articles

SKOUT system

Iterative Health • Gastroenterology-Urology • 05/09/2025

510(k)IEC 62304 Class B
FDA Summary PDF

Device Purpose

The SKOUT system is a software-based computer-aided detection (CADe) system designed by Iterative Health to assist gastroenterologists in real-time identification of colorectal polyps during white light colonoscopy. Through robust non-clinical performance testing, including software verification, validation, and algorithm performance, the system has demonstrated substantial equivalence to predicate devices, confirming its safety and effectiveness for clinical use in colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.

Summary

The SKOUT system, developed by Iterative Health, has been deemed substantially equivalent to existing legally marketed predicate devices, enabling its market entry. This software-based computer-aided detection (CADe) system is engineered to provide real-time assistance to qualified gastroenterologists during white light colonoscopy examinations, specifically for identifying potential colorectal polyps. It functions by displaying a visual aid, such as a blue rectangular outline, on the endoscopic monitor to highlight suspicious areas and includes a device status indicator. The system is exclusively intended for adult patients undergoing colorectal cancer screening or surveillance procedures, serving as an auxiliary tool that does not replace the clinician's medical judgment or act as a primary diagnostic instrument. Its market clearance is contingent upon adherence to various ongoing regulatory provisions, including annual registration, device listing, good manufacturing practices, proper labeling, and compliance with the Unique Device Identification System (UDI Rule) and Quality System regulation, which covers design controls and corrective actions. Non-clinical performance testing, encompassing electrical safety, usability, electromagnetic compatibility, software verification and validation, and algorithm performance, was rigorously conducted to affirm the device's safety and effectiveness. These tests confirmed its equivalence to predicate devices, despite minor updates to its hardware and software components, ensuring its readiness for clinical application.

AI Regulatory Concerns

Powered byJev by TypeSafe AI

Jev reads the full FDA letter and returns calibrated concern probabilities per regulatory category. These are AI estimates, not regulatory advice.

Keywords

SKOUT systemIterative HealthColorectal polypsCADe systemColonoscopyReal-time detectionSubstantial equivalenceMedical device regulationSoftware verificationAlgorithm performance

Device Metadata

Submission Number
K251126
Company
Iterative Health
Panel
Gastroenterology-Urology
Product Code
N/A
Data Type
N/A
Clinical Function
N/A
AI Function
N/A
AI Subclass
N/A

Relevant Clinical Questions

  • Q1. How does the SKOUT system's real-time detection performance compare to traditional colonoscopy without CADe assistance in terms of polyp detection rate and false positive rate?; What specific types of polyps (e.g., flat, serrated, diminutive) is the SKOUT system most effective at detecting, and are there any types it tends to miss?; What is the learning curve for gastroenterologists to effectively integrate the SKOUT system into their practice, and how does it impact procedure time?; Beyond the non-clinical performance testing, what clinical trial data, if any, supports the long-term efficacy and impact on patient outcomes (e.g., interval cancer rates) of using the SKOUT system?; How does the SKOUT system account for variations in endoscopic image quality, and what are its limitations in challenging anatomical or preparation conditions?

Risk Classification

ESL Analysis
FDA Device ClassII

FDA Class II via 510(k) pathway; IEC 62304 Class B (software safety classification); Post-§524B but no clear network capability detected

Learn how Parasoft automates IEC 62304 compliance testing →

Cybersecurity Evidence

Powered by SBOMator™

Based on AI-generated device summaries, not the full FDA submission. Items not detected here may still be present in the complete submission package.

Cyber Score50/100
SBOM Evidence✓ Detected in Summary
Cyber Risk Assessment⚠ Not in summary - likely in full submission per §524B
Postmarket Plan✓ Detected in Summary
§524B ApplicableYes

Supply Chain BOM Evidence

Based on the CycloneDX / OWASP ECMA-424 xBOM ecosystem. Detection is from the AI-generated summary.

SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials(software component)
✓ Detected
ML-BOMMachine Learning Bill of Materials(algorithm, labeling)
✓ Detected
SaaSBOMSoftware-as-a-Service Bill of Materials
- Not detected
HBOMHardware Bill of Materials(hardware)
✓ Detected
CBOMCryptography Bill of Materials
- Not detected
VDR/VEXVulnerability Disclosure Report / Vulnerability Exploitability eXchange
- Not detected
OBOMOperations Bill of Materials
- Not detected

Analysis:

• Analysis is based on the AI-generated device summary, not the full FDA submission package. Click "Analyze Full FDA PDF" below to scan the actual submission document.

• Evidence of SBOM, ML-BOM, HBOM detected in AI-generated device summary.

• Cybersecurity risk assessment not referenced in AI-generated device summary. FDA cybersecurity guidance (2023) expects this for cyber devices.

• Not detected in AI-generated device summary: SaaSBOM, CBOM, VDR/VEX, OBOM. These may be present in the full FDA submission.

Preparing a similar submission?

ESL takes complete ownership of your software evidence work - SBOM & CVE remediation with SBOMator™, static analysis & unit testing with Parasoft, traceability, and full IEC 62304 lifecycle support.

Assess Your Readiness →Or contact ESL directly
SKOUT system - Iterative Health | ESL FDA AI Device Intelligence